Thursday, November 24, 2022

Happy Franksgiving


Thanksgiving began as the American version of the harvest festival.  It featured food native to this place: turkey, potatoes, corn, cranberries, etc.  It was also introduced by pious ideologues and racists, and that strain of it continued past the obliteration of Native American societies that first harvested those foods.

Then there was the bizarre 1930s version of Red v. Blue, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared Thanksgiving to be celebrated on the fourth Thursday of November instead of the traditional last Thursday, which that year (as this year) was the fifth Thursday.  Many Republicans refused to celebrate this holiday then, calling it Franksgiving.  

These days there are many variations in menu and activities, which now often include football and searching on the Internet for bargain gadgets.  It also begins the holiday season when families measure themselves against the ideal--in this case, Norman Rockwell's Thanksgiving paintings--and find that there are at least as many angry words, sulks, disappointments, bewilderments and tears as radiant smiles and gratitude.

The gratitude behind it all originally was for nature's bounty, or at least the subsistence nature provided.  Beginning with those first ideologues in New England and Virginia,  Americans' relationship to nature however has been more hostile than grateful.  Settlers and their descendants have been busy ruining the land and waters and even the air for several centuries, and we are close to finishing the job.  But maybe we can acknowledge this with a little grace as we're saying grace, and try to do better.  The natural world is the source of life, including our big and dubious brains.  The rest of nature would be grateful if we'd start using them wisely.

Tuesday, November 22, 2022

Thank you, Nancy

When Nancy Pelosi announced that she was retiring as Speaker of the House and leader of House Democrats on the floor of the House of Representatives, she wore a white pants suit.  It was the style of pants suit that has become the standard uniform for women in Washington public life, and for all I know it was started--and certainly aided and abetted--by her.  The color of white was likely in honor of the Suffragettes, and therefore an acknowledgement of the history she made as a woman.

There have been important and powerful women in the federal government before.  For example, the 1930s New Deal under FDR was one of the most consequential sets of programs in American history, and three key women were crucial to its character and consequences: First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, Secretary of Labor Francis Perkins and administrator of the Federal Theatre Project Hallie Flanagan.

Since then there have been women as Secretary of State, White House advisors and now as Vice-President. But no woman has risen to as conspicuous leadership role as Nancy Pelosi.  As Speaker of the House she set the agenda and (when the President was a Democrat and sane) managed the President's programs, while herself being second in the line of succession to the Presidency itself.

Attaining that status made history for women and for gender equality.  But Nancy Pelosi made history in wider ways, as one of the most effective House Leaders and Speakers of all time.  In support and in opposition, she was the key figure in Washington of the past 19 years.  She was both daring and reliable,  leading through listening and keeping promises.  

As Leader, she raised many millions of dollars and actively recruited and supported Democratic candidates.  She was in large part responsible for the majorities that she led in her two terms as Speaker, and instrumental in many successful elections in 2022 that allowed Democrats to beat the odds. 

In the chaos that Washington has been throughout this century, she was the one person whose presence gave me any sense of stability and control throughout most of that time.  She could count votes, and she could be counted on.  

She endured levels of hate and abuse for decades that would break most of us in days.  When her husband was attacked with a hammer in his own bed by a man looking to shatter her kneecaps, she said it would figure in her decision on her future.  It did--it did not dissuade her from keeping her agreement to yield leadership this year, but it did cause her to remain as a Member of the House, just so they wouldn't get the satisfaction. 

She knew how to not make perfection the enemy of the good, and still she stood on principle even when others in her party got squeamish.  She was at one time one of the few prominent Washington leaders to openly support the Dalai Lama and Tibet against the tyrannies of China.  I believe her more recent act of defiance is supporting human rights in Taiwan stems from this experience.

She was oriented towards the future.  That's the meaning behind her often repeated mantra of supporting (for example) childcare and family leave but also efforts to address the climate crisis with the words "for the children."  She was also the first mother--and first grandmother--to be Speaker of the House.

Thank you, Nancy for your courage and grace, and all you did to hold back the ugliness and chaos, and to advance important programs like Obamacare and the remnants of the Green Deal (otherwise known as the Affordable Care Act and the Inflation whatever act.)  Now the torch is passing to a new generation.  Let's hope they can hold it as high.     

Monday, November 21, 2022

Solitude Late at Night in the Woods


I
The body is like a November birch facing the full moon
 And reaching into the cold heavens.
 In these trees there is no ambition, no sodden body, no leaves,
 Nothing but bare trunks climbing like cold fire!

 II
 My last walk in the trees has come. At dawn
 I must return to the trapped fields,
 to the obedient earth. 
The trees shall be reaching all winter.

 III
 It is a joy to walk in the bare woods.
 The moonlight is not broken by the heavy leaves.
 The leaves are down and touching the soaked earth,
 Giving off the odor that partridges love.

--Robert Bly

Saturday, November 19, 2022

Where is the non-military aid to Ukraine?

 I read stories about American military aid to Ukraine, but so far no stories about non-military aid.  At the moment Ukraine is facing winter with half its power-producing infrastructure out of commission because of Russian missile attacks.  Why isn't America responding?

The US saved a starving Berlin with around the clock airlifts of food when the Soviets blockaded the city after World War II.  The geopolitical situation is different, but in essence, the real situation is not so different: Ukraine needs help.  They need to quickly repair lots of infrastructure, and in the meantime, they need the means for their population to not freeze, and to maintain health and safety with working water and sewage systems (which require electricity.)  

Why aren't we hearing about humanitarian aid to a country suffering from war crimes?  From the bombing of civilian infrastructure with no other purpose than to make people suffer, to deny them the means of life? This isn't the case of insurmountable problems in a remote country. We're openly providing military aid to Ukraine.  Where is the non-military aid when they need it?

Where is Europe, where is America?  Where are the stories about how they are helping? 

Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Thoreau for the Day


 "In any weather, at any hour of the day or night, I have been anxious to improve the nick of time, and notch it on my stick too; to stand on the meeting of two eternities, the past and the future, which is precisely the present moment; to toe that line."

Thoreau

Walden: "Economy"

Monday, November 14, 2022

Fall Wind


 Pods of summer crowd around the door;
 I take them in the autumn of my hands.

 Last night I heard the first cold wind outside;
 the wind blew soft, and yet I shiver twice:

 Once for thin walls, once for the sound of time.

 --William Stafford

Saturday, November 12, 2022

Eyes Quietly on Kherson

 I have a queasy feeling about Kherson, the city in Ukraine abandoned by the Russian military.  Previously Russian civilians and sympathizers were evacuated to Russia.  Today elite elements of the Ukraine armed forces are in the city and the region, greeted as liberators by the remaining population loyal to Ukraine.  The Kremlin has been uncharacteristically quiet about all this.

I am trying to trust that American and other Intelligence would know or at least suspect if Russia were preparing for a nuclear strike on Kherson.  But Russia laid the groundwork for justifying it in the past month or so.  I'll take comfort that if Russia has laid the trap as well as the groundwork but does not launch nuclear bombs on that city in the very near future, then it is unlikely it will use nuclear weapons anywhere in Ukraine. (Though if the reason they don't is that Kherson is too close to Russia itself, then that assumption is shaky.) 

I hope this triumph for Ukraine holds up, and the world isn't being suckered, only to awaken to the greatest shock of the century so far. 

Friday, November 11, 2022

This Week is Not Last Week

 John Kenneth Galbraith coined the phrase "the conventional wisdom" back in the 1950s, and for awhile it became a conventional description, until it mostly faded away.  Too bad.  It's even more necessary now. The conventional wisdom is always powerful, and is made more powerful by the echo chamber of news media and social media.  The problem is that while it becomes conventional, it does not always reflect wisdom.  Hence the 2022 elections.

In the early 1970s, journalist Timothy Crouse came up with the phrase "pack journalism." (This in turn was a play on the earlier phrase, "hack journalism," popular in his father's day.)  Tim observed its manifestation aboard press buses during the 1972 election campaign.  In those days, the wire services were very powerful--their news stories were published in hundreds of newspapers around the world.  Reporters who didn't file the basic story that the wire services did on a given campaign day had to justify their different story to their editors.  Most simply found out what the wire service reporters were saying the story of the day was, and they more or less parroted it.  

That was the most obvious form of pack journalism.  But just a busload of reporters, together all day and every day, talking about the campaign, tended to form the news into a conventional wisdom.  They wrote the stories, and politicians etc. had to react to it; editorial writers and other reporters picked up on it, and so on.  Pack Journalism.

Today there's no leader of the pack--nobody has that authority--but there is pack journalism nonetheless.  The busload of journalists is now called the Internet plus cable news.  The conventional wisdom can form fast and is sped around the world mostly by social media. In this sense, the conventional wisdom becomes an algorithm.  It is self-enforced, and self-reinforced. Everybody is their own editor--they are afraid to be wrong, so they amplify the echo.  

Several columnists analyzed why the media was so wrong; Dana Milbank in the Washington Post was especially specific.  But those who blame only the punditry have it half right: the same conventional wisdom that the pundits push markedly influenced news headlines and coverage.  That's one reason I stopped reading the news a week or more before the election.  They clearly had a story and they were sticking to it.  There would be nothing new to learn.

Last week's conventional wisdom was the coming Red Tide of Republican victories.  This week's conventional wisdom is that Democrats did amazingly better than expected.  In between, voters voted, with quite possibly no reference to either story.

The overall outcomes of this election are still unknown, since many elections--including key ones--are not yet tallied.  The initial fallout suggests however that things have calmed down.  The elections worked well, candidates who lost mostly conceded, there was no appreciable violence during or after Election Day.  Most of the offices that handle elections will still be run by people who respect the results.  

A parallel story this week involves the chaos at Twitter.  Facebook seems to be a primary conduit for right wing craziness at the grassroots, but Twitter has been the chief social media enabler of pack journalism and the moment-to-moment conventional wisdom.  (At least that's how it seems to me. All I know about social media is what I read in the paper.)  A wounded (and hence less fashionable) Twitter might help calm the info waters at that level as well.  It may be that particular fever has broken, too.  Who knows?

It may not be more than a momentary lull, time enough for a deep breath, and maybe a subtle reset or two. Meanwhile, the fate of the Earth is being addressed at the COP27 Climate Conference.  Serious people have made a serious proposal for nations that enriched themselves with carbon-producing industries to start taking responsibility to help the poorer nations that are already victims of catastrophic climate disruptions.  It's good to know that American democracy can still basically function (a low bar in other years.)  It's even better if there really are serious people at work on the world's critical problems. 

Tuesday, November 08, 2022

The Real Work

 


“The real work is becoming native in your heart, coming to understand we really live here, that this is really the continent we’re on and that our loyalties are here, to these mountains and rivers, to these plant zones, to these creatures.  The real work involves developing a loyalty that goes back before the formation of any nation state, back billions of years, and thousands of years into the future.”

 Gary Snyder

(Interview with Bill Moyers, 1995)

Sunday, November 06, 2022

Thoreau for the Day

 


"There are nowadays professors of philosophy, but not philosophers. Yet it is admirable to profess, because it was once admirable to live.  To be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, not even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust.  It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically."

Thoreau

Walden: "Economy"

photo of Albert Camus by Cartier-Bresson

Saturday, November 05, 2022

Reminder

Don't forget to turn back your clocks...to 1933 

Friday, November 04, 2022

Winter is Coming

  In the 2022 elections, some voters—no one yet knows how many—will cast their votes for a government that might best be described as authoritarian anarchy.

 This description may seem paradoxical, but unfortunately it fits.  Authoritarian dictators are at least supposed to make the trains run on time (which contrary to cliche, I'm told Mussolini didn't.)  In our 21st century American version, the trains may run only in the metaverse and on social media.  In the shared world of complex functions and dangers come breakdowns and chaos.

But on second glance, anarchy is the eventual state of authoritarian government, even (eventually) a police state.  These authoritarians at least are detached from reality twice: first because of their fealty to fanaticism, and more directly, because they are thoroughly corrupt.

For the Republican party is led by authoritarian demagogues, whose disdain for basic American democracy is loud and ever more audacious. But they have no actual policies that bear any kind of scrutiny, only slogans.  Most of them have no interest in governing nor skills to do so, and don’t much care. They are not serious people.  If they get the reigns of power in their hands, self-perpetuation will be their only goal, with other problems left unsolved, addressed only by hate and lies. Even previously routine functions are endangered by their ideological screen.  The end result is anarchy, and because of prior damage to previously resilient institutions, that end could come quickly.

 While these and other voters may have legitimate grievances, especially against the wealthy corporations and individuals that have stolen their incomes and redistributed it upwards, those grievances will once again not be addressed, and since they were enabled by several previous Republican administrations, likely made worse.

 Some of these votes, probably many of them, are in protest, and those who have thought this through may assume that, as in the past, this protest will result in the governing party (the Democrats) mending its ways and becoming more responsive.  But this time, with the very institutions that could make that possible under attack, it may become almost impossible.  Because this kind of anarchy is a kind of domestic war. 

 Most of these voters cannot imagine that the anarchy they loose will actually affect them.  But it will.  It reminds me of the notorious election of 2000, when well-meaning people on the left bought into the “Gush v. Bore” notion that there would be little difference between the presidencies of Al Gore and George W. Bush, and so it was safe to vote in protest for a hopeless third party candidate.  The next few years were shocking for all of us, but most of all for them.

 Imagination is an under-appreciated survival tool.

  Although a history through the past several decades can be traced that lead in this direction, it is supercharged to a frenzy by social media, and the resulting tendencies of news media that emphasize their worst impulses.  Still, in the still of the night, it is hard for me to imagine why anyone would vote Republican in this election.  It’s hard for me to imagine what people are thinking, as they spout venomous slogans against “the elite” that looks down on them, and then support candidates whose few discernible policies further empower the actual elites, who are already so powerful that in nearly every situation—prosperity, recession, inflation, peace, war and pandemic—they make even more money.  However, even for them, eventually the wolf will surely come.  That’s the future of authoritarian anarchy. 

Tuesday, November 01, 2022

October Surprise

 I saw a headline yesterday that provided the number of annual threats against Members of Congress, and added that it's surprising there aren't more.  This followed a headline about the attack on Paul Pelosi that said it was terrible but "not surprising."

Not surprising, that in America an 82 year old man is attacked with a hammer while asleep in his bed and  his skull is fractured, by an attacker whose stated intent is to shatter the kneecaps of his victim's wife, an 82 year old woman?  Who is second in line to the US Presidency?

When media cynics say shit like this, they add to the normalizing of the Dark Age that is coming upon us. They tell the many who are surprised, who are shocked, that they're wrong to be. We must be surprised, we must be shocked, or the humanity and human civilization that lives within each of us will die.    

Sunday, October 30, 2022

Thoreau for the Days


 "These beans have results which are not harvested by me.  Do they not grow for woodchucks partly?...Shall I not rejoice also at the abundance of the weeds whose seeds are the granary of the birds?"

Thoreau

Walden: "The Bean-Field"

Thursday, October 27, 2022

Are You Thoreau for the Day?



 "Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate."

Thoreau

Walden: Economy

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

Emerson (Thoreau really) for the Day


 "The finest qualities of our nature, like the bloom on fruits, can be preserved only by the most delicate handling.  Yet we do not treat ourselves nor one another thus tenderly."

Thoreau

Walden: Economy

Friday, October 21, 2022

Emerson for the Day



“What is a course of history, or philosophy, or poetry, no matter how well selected, or the best society, or the most admirable routine of life, compared with the discipline of looking always at what is to be seen?  Will you be a reader, a student merely, or a seer?  Read your fate, see what is before you, and walk on into futurity.”

H,D.Thoreau

 Walden: "Sound"

  Photo: "Blue Chair with Chickens" by BK

Monday, October 17, 2022

Man with One Leaf in October Night

 

The leaves turn black when they have learned how to fly
 so does the day
 but in the wind of the first hours of darkness
 sudden joy sent
 from an unknown tree 
 I have not deserved you

--W.S. Merwin

Friday, October 14, 2022

The Armageddon Watch

 

The question of whether Putin's Russia will deploy a nuclear weapon in Ukraine is a live one.  If it happens, it is likely to happen soon. The tenor in the so-called liberal media is that Putin is losing and weak, without options. But last week I believe it was the NYTimes conservative columnist Brett Stephens who predicted Putin will deploy nukes, and he suggested Kherson as a possible location. Kherson is the first city and region that Russian troops controlled at the beginning of their invasion, but Ukraine troops are closing in on it.  The Ukraine forces have already retaken a number of villages in the region.

 Since that prediction, it looks to me that the chances of a nuclear weapon being used there has increased.  So far I've only seen the Guardian reporting on the evacuation of Russians and Russian sympathizers from the region, announced by the Russian puppet governor who requested and received official Russian help in evacuating.  To me, this is an ominous sign.  If a nuclear explosion is planned there, this would be a first step. 

Putin's apparent weakness is a reason it could happen. Russia's missile attacks on Ukraine this past week were seen as a vicious but futile response to recent humiliating defeats, without military advantage.  Russia used a number of expensive weapons in the attack, and western analysts say they are likely to be depleting their available missiles, since they cannot get high tech parts from western sources anymore.  If this is so, then Putin has pretty much only his sizable arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons left as "options."  Several weeks ago Putin repeated that all types of weapons can be used--and more than hinted this includes nukes--in Russia's self-defense.  He then began the elaborate charade of essentially annexing parts of Ukraine into Russia, and one of those places is Kherson.  All of this looks like step by step preparation, though so far no one in the west is saying so publicly.

Putin's groundwork has also allowed the US and western Europe to figure out exactly what they will do if Russia uses nukes.  The element of surprise is gone.  The world will be shocked, but it is unlikely that Putin will gain military advantage because of it.  Quite the opposite.  But exactly what will happen can't be known, except that it could happen very fast.  This is another case of letting slip the dogs of war, of self-renewing and escalating violence--with uncontrollable consequences.  It all has a tragic inevitability about it.

Here in the US, the slow motion Armageddon of democracy seems about to move faster, one way or another.  Several things are coming to a head.  Donald Trump is likely to face indictment for crimes on the federal level (either directly related to Jan.6 or to crimes associated with his theft of classified documents, or both), and on the state level (in Georgia, for election tampering; and New York, for financial crimes, not to mention a rape trial.) No one knows when any of these will happen, but one or more of them could be relatively soon.

Why is that a threat to the Republic?  There was a debate in the pages of the NYTimes this past week on whether the US faces a second civil war.  As usual, the semantics of it cloud the issue (exactly what is a civil war?)  But one journalist who has been interviewing far right/Christian right zealots for decades, wrote in the Atlantic that if and when Trump is indicted for just about anything,  large scale political violence is likely to break out.  He cited in particular how heavily armed these people are, and what they are expecting to do with those weapons.  He said that at gun shows during the Obama presidency, the reason people gave for stocking up on military weapons was the fear that because of school shootings, the feds were going to come after their guns.  Now (he said) what he hears more often is that they are convinced they are fighting a war against the Great Replacement etc., and the government is their enemy.  They are preparing to fight the federal government in particular.

Another participant in the discussion, a NY Times columnist with a deep knowledge of American history and the Constitution, agreed that political violence is likely, but the US has often suffered some small scale political violence.  And he wondered if these people have the stomach for large scale, sustained warfare against trained troops.  I agree that this is uncertain. So far political violence has been perpetrated by individuals or small groups, almost always against the defenseless: congregations in a church or synagogue, old people in a supermarket, children in school.  In other words, the act of heavily armed, camo-clad cowards.

Even the attack on the Capitol last January showed division.  Some people came to commit violence against the Capitol police and anyone who stood in their way.  Most others seemed more interested in taking video with their phones and posting it, breaking things and taking souvenirs.  No one can really predict what might happen (the dogs of war again) but we are quite possibly going to find out.

Then there is the upcoming election--another grave threat on many levels.  The election polls appear useless and other surveys of attitudes etc. are contradictory, but the punditry suspects the momentum in favor of the Democrats because of the abortion decision is waning, and continuing inflation and rising gasoline prices are favoring Republicans. Because they are so much more likely to fix that, and their candidates have detailed policies and plans to do so.  Just kidding.

 The old 33% of the electorate who were Always Trumpers now seems to have become 40%, and Republican power brokers are looking only at the R, not the candidate.  Will voters follow, and support the certifiably insane, the holy warriors, the authoritarians and white supremacists, the thoroughly corrupt, the dangerously stupid?  Will this be a wave election one way or another, or a state by state, district by district decision?

We probably won't know for days and possibly weeks after election day.  And unless our news media has gotten better and better equipped to cover this story, we may not know how corrupted the election processes are in individual districts and states.  We can be sure that Rabid Right Republicans will extol every one of their victorious candidates as elected righteously, and every election they lose as illegitimate.

Again, all this domestic potential for Armageddon has historical preparation, and an air of tragic inevitability.  But it may not happen on a very large scale, at least not this year.  However, a Republican controlled House and/or Senate next year may well usher in mayhem, as they hold the country and world economy hostage to go after old people (by slashing Social Security and Medicare) as well as young women, immigrants and the planet. Meanwhile as officeholders these brainless and heartless fanatics will have no capacity to govern, especially in times of complex crisis.  

Well, enjoy your day.  Every day you can enjoy.

Thursday, October 06, 2022

History of My Reading: Cambridge Baptism

Carol and me with kittens from Stuff's litter at our Cambridge apt.
I returned with Carol and company to Cambridge after my Cummington community experience in August 1970.  By this time Carol and her Knox College friends had moved into a summer sublet—probably more of a housesitting gig—on a quiet leafy side street at 13 Ellery St., apt.4.  It was about half a block from the central artery of Massachusetts Avenue, known colloquially as Mass Ave: a roughly 16 mile road that begins in Boston and defines the heart of Cambridge before heading onward past Somerville to Concord and the fabled Lexington Green, and beyond.  
13 Ellery St.

It wasn’t until I’d gone to college in the Midwest that I heard people give city directions in terms of north/south, east/west (cf. “Go north three blocks and turn west.”) In western Pennsylvania as in most of the northeast, cities were ordered by the borders of serpentine rivers and eccentric coastlines, as well as hills and ridges and valleys.  So while Cambridge is vaguely north of Boston, it is connected by Mass Ave in a way that defies the compass.  Orientation reverts to directions like left and right.

 So emerging from the tree-shadowed Ellery Street to busy, noisy Mass Ave puts Central Square (Cambridge) and Boston to your left, and Harvard Square a few long blocks to your right. While I was living there the rest of that summer, the first commercial building to the right on Mass Ave housed several businesses, including the F-Stop camera store, Cheap Thrills records, a music and musical instrument store, and the Orson Welles Cinema.  At the time I first saw it, the Welles was a single screen, so-called “repertory cinema” showing foreign and offbeat American movies. (It had a film school as well, though that was not immediately obvious to me.) 

Orson Welles at the Orson Welles
The Orson Welles intrigued me. I’d been increasingly interested in film and filmmaking. I had one film course at Iowa, and in my months at Buffalo I got to know film professor (and McLuhan pal) Gerald O’Grady.  I attended a number of his film classes, especially when they were showing movies.

 Carol had gotten interested in film, too, especially after she read The Film Director as Superstar by Joseph Gelmis, a collection of interviews (Kubrick, Bertolucci, Lindsay Anderson, Richard Lester, John Cassavettes and a very young Francis Ford Coppola, among others), a book I’d left with her when I was at Cummington.

 We emerged from one of our first movies there when I saw a familiar face in the lobby.  It was Steve Goldberg, formerly of Knox College, who turned out to be the theatre manager.  He remembered me, and in the course of our conversation, suggested I try writing for the local weekly paper called the Phoenix.  I laughed before I nodded an acknowledgement. I didn’t see where I would fit in. I knew nothing about Boston or Cambridge, and though I’d seen the Phoenix a few times, I still didn’t have a handle on it.  It was more seriously journalistic than an underground newspaper, but it wasn’t like a daily either. A few years later in his defining New Yorker piece, Calvin Trillin would describe the growing number of such journals as “sea-level” newspapers. Today, their descendants are usually lumped together as “alternative.” 

(As if meeting a former Knox student there wasn’t coincidence enough, I soon after walked into the music store next door to see behind the counter someone I’d known at Greensburg (PA) Central Catholic High School. Paul Lenart had been a year ahead of me, and had gone off to Columbia University on a football scholarship, which made him a subject of my envy since that was my aspirational and unaffordable first choice school.  But he’d been injured early on, lost his scholarship and was now a guitarist in a regionally popular band that sometimes played at Jack’s bar near Central Square, famous then for featuring Bonnie Raitt before she went national.  Eventually he sold me my next guitar.)

Pierrot Le Fou
I soon had my first immersive film experience, when the Welles programmed a Jean-Luc Godard festival, a bill of Godard double-features that changed every couple of days.  I got a discount ticket book and saw many of them, almost all for the first time (among them “Band of Outsiders,” “Alphaville,” “Contempt,” “Masculin Feminin,” and my favorite, “Pierrot le Fou” with Jean-Paul Belmondo and Anna Karina), eventually watching from the back row while drinking coffee and smoking Gauloise cigarettes.  Mass Ave and the Welles would turn out to be mainstays of my time in Cambridge and Boston.

 Past the Orson Welles, two particular wonders of Harvard Square awaited.  First, the bookstores.  There was one before the square, but more past the high brick walls of Harvard Yard that began the Square proper. Harvard Bookstore was right there on Mass Ave, shortly to be joined by its book annex, with hurt books and remainders.  Around the corner was the Grolier Bookshop, reputed to be a gathering place for poets, though I never experienced this.  It was one of the contacts that Robert Creeley wrote down for me.

 The huge Harvard Coop had a big book section. There were more bookstores on Brattle Street behind it, including one of my favorites, Reading International.  Across from there and below street level on Mt. Auburn St. was Passim, a bookstore during the day, and a music venue at night—it had formerly been Club 47, where Joan Baez first sang in concert, among many other luminaries of the folk revival 1960s.

 But bookstores weren’t the only sources of books.  There were two Ecology Action storefronts and a couple of other such organizations that collected and gave away surplus books, and since it was Cambridge, the quality was high.  I scored a mother lode of books at one such place on a memorable afternoon, and walked out embarrassed at my haul, but ecstatic.

 I was soon reading Henry Miller for the first time, and his rhapsodizing descriptions of Paris bookstores suggested that this might be my Paris. That feeling was reinforced by the cafes, some with outdoor seating, an anomaly in America at the time. There were not varieties of coffees available on every corner in the 70s, but in and around Harvard Square there were coffees closer to their foreign origins, such as the Turkish coffee in a dark café buried in a complex of shops.  

Harvard Sq 1970.  BK photo.
Soon I had a favorite place: the unpretentious Patisserie below street level on the section of Brattle Street that wound around to the left as you faced the Harvard Coop.  Its menu was modest but everything tasted great.  I loved especially their almond croissants. Its French coffee had a taste still unique in my experience.  It tasted blue, the equivalent of Gauloise smoke.  I was a frequent enough customer that the owner (who was Greek) knew me by sight, and remarked on how long it might have been since I was there last.

 The riches of the cafes included the newspapers left by patrons and strewn around, not only the Boston Globe and the counterculture and political papers but the New York Times and Washington Post.  There were magazines of all kinds from everywhere at several of the bookstores, with walls of them at the Out of Town News just outside the Harvard Square subway entrance.

 The cafes completed the mental ambience of the bookstores, and I felt as comfortable as I got, reading and writing in them. That extended to less exotic but still strange venues, like the ice cream place with the delicate 1890s wrought iron tables and chairs, and the Pewter Pot, which served a variety of muffins (very big in Boston) and 15 cent coffee in Pewter mugs.  I was reading and writing there once when I glanced up and saw a man passing quickly by the window, looking my way with a wistful half smile. I was sure it was the writer and actor Buck Henry. And it might have been, for this was Harvard Square, where I routinely saw Nobel Prize winners bicycling by.

 The apartment on Ellery Street was large and well kept, though mostly empty.  It was on the top floor, with easy access to the flat roof, where a lot of sunbathing had gone on all summer, and continued while I was there.  But with fall, the sublet was up, Carol’s friends returned to school, and we had to look for another place. 

Repainted and gentrified, 325 Columbia St.
now. First floor apt. was ours.
We clearly couldn’t afford anything so spacious in such a prime area, but we did find a large room at the front of a duplex in East Cambridge, at 325 Columbia Street. (According to a notebook, I found it by answering an ad in the Phoenix titled ISMAEL COME HOME.)  The street turned out to be a kind of local truck route, so the rumbling was fairly constant, but I eventually got used to it.

 We painted our room teal blue, with lighter blue around the sort-of bay windows.  We painted the living room in shades of sea green and violet. The previous tenants had left a lot of psychedelic posters, which I cut up and affixed to a wall in the narrow hallway as collages. (Through unforwarded mail and some detective work, I learned that this apartment had been the gathering place for poets and others in the antiwar movement, and that poet Denise Levertov had often been there. She confirmed this in an exchange of letters. We had met my senior year at Knox.) 

My Cambridge reading started there with authors unauthorized in my college lit classes.  Both Carol and I read Jack Kerouac, beginning with The Dharma Bums (in which a character based on Gary Snyder has a large role) and Big Sur, even before On the Road.

 I moved on to Henry Miller, whose style I found enthralling despite the sometimes questionable content: the novels Tropic of Cancer (my sun sign) and Tropic of Capricorn (Carol’s), his narrative nonfiction (The Air Conditioned Nightmare, The Colossus of Maroussi) and essays (The Books in My Life and The Wisdom of the Heart, in which he described his Zen-like approach to writing.)There was soon something of a Henry Miller boom in the 70s, and at the Orson Welles I saw an autobiographical film on him, and another on his compatriot Anais Nin (I also acquired and read some of her volumes of diary entries which were then popular.)

 I tried reading William Burroughs, whose theories of writing—especially his cut-up method—fascinated me, but I didn’t match up with his resulting fiction.  There were others, but I most recall Kerouac’s ecstatic discoveries as reflecting the flavor of those first few months for us on Columbia Street.

 I was still attracted to poetry with a surrealistic flavor. I read Robert Bly’s translations of Pablo Neruda, more of Bill Knott (who I’d encountered in New Haven) and a new poet, James Tate, who I heard read and met in Cambridge. (He had exasperated tales of trying to help Knott just get through life and empty the garbage.) I’d admired Jon Anderson’s first book of poems, Looking for Jonathan, in 1968, and now the harder edged Death and Friends in 1970.  

Gino Severini self-portrait
In the next months my reading expanded in different directions.  For example, I began seeking out books on the modern artists of the early twentieth century, from the Dadaists to those artists who clustered in Paris—Surrealists, Cubists, Futurists and more.  It was then I discovered the Italian Futurist Gino Severini—the only one of that group who lived in Paris and knew everyone from Picasso to Erik Satie. With the same last name as my mother, I learned he might have been a blood relative of my grandfather, but even if only a relative in imagination, he became a guide over the years. 

 At the same time I also discovered Dorothea Tanning, the only American and only woman enrolled in the Paris Surrealists.  She was a native of Galesburg, Illinois, and (as I later found) a Knox College student who preceded me (by several decades) as an editor of the college literary magazine.  My fascination with this place and period, which had begun with the expatriate writers like Joyce, Fitzgerald and Hemingway, brought me around through the painters to other writers, particularly the French poets Guillaume Apollinaire (another friend of Gino) and Paul Eluard. 

Thanks to the extensive collection of cheap art prints at the Harvard Coop department store (the large ones were a dollar), we had our own modern gallery (though the Vermeer in the living room—a print I still have—was the exception): a Magritte and Picassos in our room, a Max Ernst in the kitchen and a Paul Klee in the bathroom, which otherwise featured a large ceramic bathtub with a Moby Dick shower curtain but no shower, and an ancient pull-chain flush toilet.

 I continued reading about ecology, including Paul Shepard’s second anthology, Environ/Mental.  I don’t remember what precipitated it, but I began reading Buckminster Fuller obsessively.  The autobiographical sections in Ideas and Integrities grabbed me—his despair at his lack of worldly success and acceptance of his ideas that drove him to the edge of Lake Michigan, contemplating suicide.  That resonated.  But even navigating his strange vocabulary I saw him as literally a sailor (he’d served in the Navy) who knew what he was talking about with his concept of Spaceship Earth—that all we needed to live was aboard, but we were limited mostly to what was on the ship. 

 Fuller’s concept of an “anticipatory design science” made a lot of sense, even if I couldn’t follow all his proposals. A few years later I attended one of his improvised lectures at M.I.T., and saw him up close as I joined a cluster around him afterwards to hear more.

 I got hold of a new anthology for students called Worlds in the Making, which related ecology to the future.  I was already looking at the future as a subject.  Carol and I were also reading ostensibly more serious books in the psychedelic/countercultural vein, including on astrology, and we got our charts done (I’ve lost mine but I still have Carol’s.) I was nervously consulting the I Ching, which never quite assuaged my frustrations at my lack of worldly progress, probably not the best attitude.

 And we were surrounded by lots and lots of music. For awhile we didn’t have any at home, but Carol made a trip back to Chicago and shipped more of her belongings to Columbia Street, including the component stereo she’d had at Knox. By the end of 1970, the Beatles breakup led to an efflorescence of new albums: McCartney’s solo album (which we had from the previous spring), Lennon and Ono’s separate Plastic Ono Band albums, Ringo’s “Sentimental Journey” and “Beaucoups of Blues,” and George Harrison’s triple album, “All Things Must Pass.” The flood continued in 1971 with “Ram” (McCartney), “Imagine” (Lennon) and the multi-disk live album from Harrison’s all-star concert for Bangla Desh, the first such charity event. 

J.T. & Carole King
James Taylor was a kind of favorite son in Boston, and the “Sweet Baby James” album that made him a star was played everywhere.  “After the Goldrush” also came out in 1970, and began my Neil Young obsession.  Carol and I had to be selective in the concerts we attended, but we did see Neil Young play in Boston, and caught a concert in the now legendary James Taylor and Carole King tour.  The strangest concert I remember we attended was when Poco opened for the Moody Blues. We went to hear Poco, assuming the Boston crowd was there for the psychedelic Moody Blues.  But Poco blew that audience away, and nobody much was in the mood for the Moody heaviness afterwards.

 There were also free concerts, including a few in the Cambridge Common, just beyond Harvard Square.  Carol and I heard the distant music one Sunday in Harvard Square and walked over there.  We passed a smiling young woman coming the other way and asked her who was playing.  “It’s a beautiful day,” she said.  We agreed, it was a beautiful, sunny day.  But who was playing?  She laughed.  “It’s A Beautiful Day.”  Yes, there was such a group—I remember staring stoned at their album cover a few years before in Galesburg. 

The ex-Beatles releases, the back-and-forth accusation songs of Lennon and McCartney, and John and Yoko’s events and interviews were widely discussed in the pages of Rolling Stone and other music papers as well as the Boston area weeklies, and among people we met.  Lennon’s first album and Neil Young’s “Goldrush” in particular grabbed me and didn’t let go for years.  But Carol and I also listened alot to John Phillips’ (of the Mamas and Papas) solo album, even though the music media dismissed it. I don’t think I ever quite convinced her of the brilliance of the Bee Gees though, even if I played their “Odessa” double album too often. 

 

In a new relationship and a home of our own, and with the stimulations of my Cambridge baptism, I was bursting with creative expressions.  I wrote in every form from verse to polemic.  I was writing songs at a furious clip, enlisting Carol to add bits of gentle percussion to tapes I made of them, at first just to not forget what I’d written.

  Inspired by Dadaist Kurt Schwitters, I resumed constructing collages, as did Carol.  I briefly continued my Cummington experimentations with painting.  And I devised and physically made a board game—the Cambridge Conspiracy Game.  It was arranged like a Monopoly board but with Cambridge sites. Its purpose however was as a kind of anti-Monopoly. The object was not competition.  The only way to win was for players to cooperate.  Everybody won, or everybody lost.

 Columbia Street extended down from Mass Ave on the Boston side edge of Central Square a considerable distance before it got to us. Our building was a bit run down, and so was the immediate neighborhood. It was not fashionable or even recognizably Cambridge. It evidently had been Irish and (a bit further on) Italian, but was now mostly Portuguese. 

  We shopped for major groceries at the Purity Supreme supermarket in Central Square, but we also explored the shops in Inman Square: a walk down Columbia St. for a long block in the opposite direction from Mass Ave, and then the streets to the left that eventually led to the Harvard Square area.

  My impression was that Inman Square had once been the Italian area, and there was a very good but decently priced Italian restaurant there, that we could afford occasionally. There was also an authentic German bakery, and a large deli restaurant called S&S, that is apparently still there.

Inman Sq. early 1970s
 There was an old fashioned 5&10 next to a small grocery that sold $1 bottles of French Bordeaux wine (vin ordinaire in Paris), not far from a blues club. Legal Seafoods was the Cambridge choice for fresh seafood. We took our clothes to the Laundromat in Inman Square, where each washer and dryer had an individual name inscribed on it.  If we wanted to leave while our clothes were still in process, the Italian who owned it would watch over them, and we might come back to see them folded and waiting for us.

 This end of Cambridge was noisy and sooty, as urban a place as I’d ever lived. But we also belonged to a co-op that every week delivered organic vegetables from nearby farms (in the revolution talk of the day, it was called the Food Conspiracy.)  We also were asked to work in the fields periodically, which I remember doing once.  For awhile Carol and I tried the brown rice diet recommended by John and Yoko, so we wouldn’t be “sampaku” (supposedly you were if there was white all around your eyeballs, and it wasn’t a good sign.)  We gave that up pretty quickly, and I wrote a song about it. 

 I extended my ecology commitments to the household, perhaps a little too much (a succession of housemates weren’t thrilled.) But I was motivated to do kitchen cleanup and some of the cooking.  Carol made amazing Irish stew I still remember.

 Early on we added a tricolor kitten to the household, a female we named Stuff, on the theory that cats respond to sibilants when called. Soon Carol adopted a young stray, a black male we called Muk (I think as a reference to milk, which he loved.)  However, we failed to monitor their maturation, and soon we had a pregnant Stuff.

  One day I awoke to find that Carol and our housemate Andrea had panicked when they thought Stuff wasn’t delivering properly, and had rushed her to the vet who said she was fine, but that adventure caused Stuff’s labor to stop.  We had to take her back to induce birth, and by then I was the only one with the nerve to be present for the actual births.  Stuff had six kittens of various hues and combinations, including a silver gray male.  We decided to keep him, and named him Gray.  Those three cats—Stuff, Muk and Gray-- would be under my care for the next twenty years.

 All this may sound idyllic but of course it wasn’t quite. We both had demons to work through, and after the initial overriding bliss, we had each other to get used to.  Neither of us had anything but vague direction, and so along with the freedom of exploration, we had anxieties.  Plus the complications of family pressures, housemates, and a few neighborhood and apartment problems, etc. But complications is all they were. We had what Carol would later describe as a good little life.  

Carol started out working as a waitress at the counter of the Brigham’s ice cream shop in Central Square, which was also a kind of luncheonette, with coffee, sandwiches, etc. She wore a light brown uniform and dispensed “frappes” (Bostonese for milk shakes) and ice cream cones with “Jimmies” (sprinkles) on top. She soon figured out how to sneak me almost free meals.  She thought the manager didn’t notice, but it turned out he did, and didn’t care. 

 The main Cambridge post office building was nearby, and it may have been an employee having lunch at Brigham’s that alerted Carol to job openings at that post office. She took the Civil Service exam and was quickly hired, perhaps as a temporary for the Christmas season rush, but she was kept on afterwards.  To my surprise she liked it there, especially her co-workers, and she visibly began to open up again to the outside world.

 I “took in” typing, edited and rewrote graduate school papers, and had temp jobs, such as working in college bookstores during textbook rush or doing inventory, and painting the vast interior of a former Harvard eating club preparing to become a restaurant, Grendel’s Den on Winthrop St. and across Brattle from my Patisserie, near Harvard Square. It’s still there.  (Though I thought I did good work on those walls and ceilings, I was fired for insubordination, for sticking up for a colleague being bullied. He probably thought I was a dope for doing so.) 

hawker later in 70s (not me)
I eventually added a weekly gig as a “hawker,” selling one or both of the counterculture papers on a street corner (in my case, at Prospect and Mass Ave in Cambridge.) By then—probably early 1971—the Cambridge-based Phoenix had been joined by Boston After Dark, which had started out as a tabloid of mostly entertainment listings and stories, but by then had expanded to a full weekly newspaper, with news and arts coverage.

 Unlike most alternative weeklies since, these papers weren’t given away, but sold. Both had gained initial circulation with free classified ads, personals mostly.  The next attraction was coverage of the kinds of arts and entertainment that appealed to young readers, including the hordes of college students at the many colleges and universities in the Boston area.  The writers were also young, and spoke the same language, unlike the stodgy dailies.  That applied to the cultural and political coverage and point of view of news stories.  There was a huge potential readership that had nowhere else to go locally.

 For some reason lost to history, I gravitated towards selling Boston After Dark.  I took the T (Boston area’s subway/light rail system, which Carol likened to amusement park rides) to the Boston printing plant, picked up and paid for the number of papers I was gambling I could sell, and transited back to my Cambridge corner.

 There were a lot of hawkers.  Every corner in and near Harvard Square was taken, and often enough, one or two of the corners near me were also claimed. There were occasional turf wars, but generally hawkers respected the claims of regulars.   Where I was, the clientele came from surrounding office buildings, usually at lunchtimes.  My best customers were young women from those offices, who bought their copy from me with their friends watching from the floors above.  

 Since I didn’t always sell them all, I had lots of opportunities to read what was in them.  I read the Phoenix as well. Meanwhile, I fantasized my own publication, complete with articles I’d like to see in it. Eventually the light bulb went off, and I realized I might pitch these existing publications with those ideas.  That took a surprisingly long time.

 I was always sending things out, poems and stories but increasingly also reviews and articles.  I had my first acceptance in Rolling Stone, with an unsolicited review of the book, A Child’s Garden of Verses for the Revolution, by my erstwhile teacher and correspondent, William Eastlake. I did a piece on Henry Miller accepted by a west coast publication called Organ.  The editor liked it, and agreed to assign a piece on Buckminster Fuller.  I think the magazine folded before it could be published, but I did get paid. 

I’ve found the notebook from this time which contains my first draft of a long poem called “Ears.”  I remember it as inspired by a Kenneth Koch poem on the theme of eyes that I heard him read, but I can’t locate that poem and don’t remember where the reading was. A version of “Ears” as well as several other poems and a prose piece of impressions of Cambridge, appeared in a one-off publication called Words Cambridge in spring 1971.  The people who appeared in it put the publication together, assembling and binding it in the offices of the Orson Welles cinema.  Another version of “Ears” would appear at the end of the year in a more professionally produced though also short-lived literary magazine, Cotelydon. 

Carol 1968 at Knox. Bill Thompson photo.
Both Carol and I had various physical complaints that sent us for tests at the Cambridge hospital and especially to Massachusetts General, which because it was a teaching hospital, was more open to doing tests for people who couldn’t otherwise pay for them, as long as students could observe or participate.  My tests proved inconclusive.  The best advice I got was “drink more water.”

 So I was not unduly concerned when Carol went for tests at Mass General, after my repeated urging. Her health had always been somewhat shaky, but there had been two recent incidents in which she’d been overcome by fatigue.  We’d attended a screening at the Orson Welles and met the filmmaker Stan Vanderbeek, who was about to show one of his films beamed by multiple projectors onto the inner dome of a building—the Moviedrome at Stony Point in New York state.  The audience would be lying on the floor looking up.  The film would last for several hours—a truly immersive experience.  We signed up for the bus to go, but when the day approached Carol suddenly felt extremely tired, so we cancelled.

 Another wave of fatigue prevented us from meeting up with some Knox friends.  We were literally out our front door when she said she had to go back.  The prospect of a long bus ride to the Moviedrome had been daunting, but this outing was not going to be so strenuous.  It seemed more serious.  

 I was back in our room when she returned from her visit to Mass General.  I asked her what the doctor said.  She brought up something else that had us both laughing.  Then I asked her again what the doctor said.  She suddenly burst into tears.  

 After initial tests she had been sent to a doctor in the hospital who diagnosed her with what was then called Hodgkin’s Disease (now Hodgkins lymphoma.)  Through her tears, and fear that she would die, she provided what turned out to be an accurate account of what the doctor said (I’ve unfortunately forgotten his name.)  

The diagnosis was serious, he said, but the good news was a new treatment that had excellent results, available at only two hospitals in the U.S.: Stanford and Massachusetts General.  It involved removing the spleen, followed by two rounds of treatments, some combination of radiation and chemotherapy. Because they'd caught it at an early stage, after that she should be fine. 

 She repeated the words but did not seem to believe them until I repeated them back to her. Part of her despair resulted from a stop at a library or bookstore on the way home where she read that the disease was usually fatal. But soon she accepted the assurances she brought back from her doctor. Later I did what research I could, which confirmed what she’d been told.

 In the early 1970s, it seemed most cancers were mysterious and fatal. Not many years before that, the word “cancer” was not even uttered in polite company (comedian Billy Crystal had a routine that reflected this.)  I was becoming a little familiar with the radiation and chemotherapy treatments because my mother had recently undergone some, and would undergo more, after Carol completed hers. But I wasn’t around for most of my mother’s, and my parents were generally secretive about such things, so I was somewhere between discreet (not wanting to embarrass my mother) and frightened. It was very different with Carol.

 I was there with her completely, every moment, every step. I was at the hospital for her spleen removal operation, and her initial treatments. Sometimes, instead of remaining in the waiting room, I would spend the estimated time outside on Boston Common before returning.  Carol waited her turn in an area reserved for patients, where she befriended a few regulars also waiting for their treatments, and heard their stories.  Some had much less hopeful prospects.  Later, when she felt stronger and self-reliance was important to her, she bolstered her confidence by going to the treatments on her own. She found her courage, partly in making it ordinary.

  At home, I took care of her as best I could.  We talked about everything involved, what she thought and how she felt, and I tended, however watchfully, to follow her lead.  She needed to comprehend and cope with what was happening to her.  A part of her body was cut out, and the rest of it subjected to the damage (including to her beautiful hair) caused by radiation and chemicals, as well as the eventual healing. 

 I could also offer a different perspective.   “You felt your body broken,” begins a poem I wrote to her, “but I saw it whole/with such/ joy at its aliveness/its softness and beauty/that the tubes hanging out/were proof only/that your loveliness/was present/transcendent…” 

 She wanted above all to be not sick, so we tried to keep things as normal as possible. She had taken up knitting, as did her friends at the hospital, to pass the time before and after treatments.  She knitted at home as well, including a six foot long, blue and green scarf for me—not often very practical (except for Doctor Who conventions) but beautiful.  I still display it. When effects of the treatments accumulated, we watched a lot of TV on our small black and white set, and she began painting, as well as making rude sculptures out of play dough.  

Carol on one of our visits to Cape Cod. BK photo

The cats helped, particularly the kittens while we had them (we placed them in other homes when they were old enough. Stuff had a second litter of four, all black.)  I recall sitting in our armchair reading, while several of the kittens chased each other, up one of my arms and down the other.

 Looking back through our earlier correspondence, a pattern of precedent emerged from the previous year—particularly Carol’s series of inexplicable fevers and fatigue.  She had been hospitalized in Galesburg months before I arrived, and one of the reasons she didn’t want to go back was her fear that she would die there.

 Over the years I’ve wondered what fate led us to Boston, where this disease could be treated.  Though the treatments themselves had serious medical consequences for her years later (they are no longer done in the same way), and both the disease and the treatments may have led to her final illness, she nevertheless had another fifty years of what might even be characterized as a fabulous life.

  Jeremy Gladstone visited us in Cambridge, on his way back to Europe (he didn't finish his dinner with us because he was "shrinking his stomach" in preparation for being on the road.)  He and Carol had a previous relationship (they’d lived together in the same house in Galesburg and the same rooms as I had the year before) and they remained friends.  They corresponded when he was in Lausanne, in French-speaking Switzerland.  He assured her that she could teach English there, and urged her to at least make a long visit. Carol was intrigued, and having the goal of a European trip helped her through her treatments.  

In the fall of 1971 I finally sent an article to Boston After Dark, with a letter inquiring about writing book reviews. The associate arts editor Jake Kugel wrote back, said he liked the article but couldn’t use it, and suggested I come in to the office to see what books they had that they wanted reviewed.  I did, and came away with at least one.  But before my first review was due, it was announced that the Chilean poet Pablo Neruda would receive the 1971 Nobel Prize in Literature.  I dashed off an article about him and sent it to Kugel.  It was published in early November.

 By the end of the year I’d published two book reviews (including one of Sylvia Plath’s novel The Bell Jar) and an article on Norman Mailer in Boston After Dark.  Meanwhile, I was in touch with Dave Marsh, editor of the Detroit-based magazine Creem (actually, their address was Walled Lake, Michigan.) Though the now-legendary Creem was mostly a rock music magazine, it published more. I may have published a review of The Greening of America there, but the first I recall of a flurry of pieces for Creem—a review of the movie “Omega Man” starring Charleston Heston—appeared in December. 

 Suddenly the apparently random aspects of my life seemed to be coalescing in these opportunities—the aimless observations of counterculture in Boulder and Berkeley, the seemingly wasted hours watching movies, listening to the latest music and discussing it all in perilous detail, and the instinctive reading and cultural curiosity, as well as the years of unread writing, of absorbing and searching for forms and expression.

 Now I was suddenly getting published regularly and meeting new people, especially at Boston After Dark.  But Carol still felt intimidated by what she perceived of that world, which was becoming my world.  And then she felt well enough, and it came time for the dream of Europe to become real.

  I went with her to Logan airport and saw her off for her first trip to England, Greece and France (sending me a pile of postcards) before settling in Switzerland.  She worked part time while taking French courses every morning, and she learned to drive.  Eventually, true to Jeremy's prediction, she  was hired as an English teacher in Lausanne.  She came back for visits and follow-ups at Mass General a couple of times.  At the end of one of these visits of several weeks (including a trip to see her parents in Chicago), I put her on the train to New York, where she would get a direct flight to Switzerland. But before the train left I impulsively bought myself a ticket to New York (it was all of $10 then) and joined her, intending to return on the next train back.  On the way she decided to stay longer, so we spent a few days in New York (hosted by Michael Shain) and Cambridge and again in New York, before she flew back to Europe.

 I have many blue airmail letters from those first years she was in Switzerland.  Early on, there was some thought of my joining her there or in England, but as my involvement in Boston increased and her attraction and commitment to Europe solidified, those thoughts faded.  Years passed, and eventually she wrote that she was getting married to someone she met there. I could only wish her well.  I didn’t hear from her for many years not long after that. It was clear that she blossomed in Europe, just as we both suspected she would not be fulfilled if she stayed.   Our roads and our lives diverged. But we always had Cambridge.