Friday, September 27, 2019

That Which Survives

Among the many things that were generally predictable the morning after the 2016 election was what happened this past week: the furor over impeachment dominated the news, easily overshadowing everything coming out of the UN climate session, including the new UN report which warns of a very dim future for the oceans, hence human civilization.  (In passing let me say that I've tried to face up to effects of the climate emergency, even keeping informed on the deeply sorrowing fate of the forests.  But I've turned away from directly confronting detailed estimations of the oceans' fates--it's just too ultimate a subject. But I can't any longer.)

Still, it hasn't taken impeachment to distract from climate crisis news.  Almost anything will do--any shiny object to distract us from the predator hiding in the hills.  But a couple of things did break through last week: the worldwide climate strikes by young people last Friday and today (with total participation estimated at 6 million people), and a girl named Greta.

Greta Thunberg, who is usually described as the teenager from Sweden, has led these enormously successful strikes, and has become a global public figure, with the predictable consequences of being lionized by some and demonized by others. Her 495 word address to the United Nations is already being compared to Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.


Is this the inflection point it appears to be--a generational change?  For several years, veteran writer and climate activist Bill McKibben has focused his energies on organizing young people in a gradually accelerating global movement.  But now it has a young leader speaking clearly and eloquently for her generation.

How this goes remains to be seen, of course.  In the US there seemed to be a generational change in opposition to America's gun spree, when  high school survivors of a mass shooting spoke out, but that seemingly has faded.

This may be different.  Greta's generation--including college-age young people --is more aware and more focused on the climate emergency than any other issue. What made Greta's UN comments especially effective was her emphasis on the future that her generation will inherit.

That has been the concern of this old fart for some years. In the past year or so I've paid particular attention to ideas about what the world will actually be like for those now growing up, because it will be the world in which they live their lives. According to the latest scientific findings, it is unlikely that human civilization will be wiped out in this century (though global pandemic and/or thermonuclear war resulting from climate stresses could change that.)  At the same time, it is highly likely that the climate emergency will dominate much of that future.  So what do they do?

I happened upon an interview with Sarah Myhre, an American climate scientist in her late 30s, with a 5 year old son.  It is enlightening on several subjects (she warns against depending wholly on science; she points out that this current movement is not just of young people but more chiefly of girls) but her words to young people about their future are especially relevant.

She tells of her encounter with a teenage boy who was "really, really profoundly upset" and despairing about the world's future, and the irrevocable ruin of the natural world in particular.  She told him this:

"So I tried to counsel him as best I could in the moment, around this window of time being a gift and an opportunity, and that he was born onto a changing planet—he did not betray the world. And that although many things will change in the future, not everything will change as well. Getting really clear about the things that are not on the table to change can help us feel safer in this moment.

In the future, regardless of the scale and the nature of the chaos and the climate breakdown, there are certain things that we will not lose. The world will always be beautiful. We will always make art, we will always sing songs, we’ll always be family, and we’ll always love one another. 

There are really important pieces about what it means to be a human being that are not on the table to change in the future. That can help folks feel secure and sort of nourished, in order to be able to look more squarely at what is on the table in the future."

Though she is certainly right that not everything will change (or fall apart) overnight, Myhre is perhaps a little too definite about the values that will survive. Though they will probably survive, it may well take effort and attention to make sure they survive.  That is part of the work of the future that these young people will need to do.  If they do, they will have lives worth living.  If as well they devote their working lives to efforts to address the causes and effects of the climate emergency, their lives will have more meaning than many lives do today.

Every generation faces a world they did not make, and challenges caused and left unmet by previous generations.  Some generations face more serious challenges than others, and surely the future is likely to be greatly challenging.  But it does present opportunities for more meaningful lives, not only in what people do for the world but in the example they set, of decency, compassion and courage.  President Obama's advice remains appropriate: "be kind, be useful, be fearless."

Thursday, September 26, 2019

The Storm After the Storm

In a book published in 2003 when he was turning 80, Norman Mailer remarked that "the most haunting question" of the 20th century was Nazism.  "Liberalism can't come near to understanding this incredible phenomenon... of a fascism that went far beyond the bounds of totalitarianism into the most despicable and extraordinary extermination of vast numbers of people.  And this, coming out of a nation that had always been exceptionally--even comically--law-abiding, suggests that the unconscious was truly a place of hideous ambushes and horrors."  

His reference to the unconscious is appropriate, for no combination of economic conditions, geopolitics, internal politics, individual ambitions or historical forces is sufficient to explain the Nazi horrors, nor the apparent free choice of Fascism.

This is perhaps even more starkly evident in the emergence of fascist and white supremacist forces and personalities in this time.  There are plenty of explanations for the basically inexplicable rise of Trump, a perfect storm of political, cultural and social currents on a given day in November 2016, despite a booming US economy and Barack Obama's successful, wholesome and inspiring presidency.  But in the end, they are also insufficient.  They also do not explain the rise of these forces in other countries, even factoring the corrupt manipulation of elections that occurred elsewhere as well as here, nor the unfamiliar impact of the Internet, though that gets closer to the nub.

The missing factor is the mysterious unconscious, individual and in combination.  As C.G. Jung warned when he was 80, the unconscious is immensely powerful and yet "we know nothing about it."  Unfortunately, the bulk of psychology has since gone mechanistic and small, so what little Jung and others had observed tentatively about the unconscious has been largely been forgotten, though perhaps the few key concepts that have become fairly ordinary (denial, projection, the Shadow, the Other) need to be taken more seriously.

Jung expressed his alarm in the 1950s, but part of the basis for that alarm is his work in the 1930s and 40s on precisely the topic Mailer identified as the most haunting question of that century.  In 1946, he published a collection of these writings about Nazism and related matters, called Essays on Contemporary Events.  These essays were later translated and appear in permanent form in the Bollingen Series of his Collected Works, named Volume 10: Civilization in Transition. 

There are several shorter collections of Jung's work available in paperback, but these essays are not usually reprinted.  But I find them extremely valuable.  It is no coincidence that I quoted from them here on this blog in the days immediately following the 2016 elections.

Jung wrote of the national acceptance of Nazism as a "mass psychosis," which basically means that people were gripped by delusions, by shadow projections and so on, while believing they were making rational choices based on evidence. They found the perfect leader in Hitler, a liar who seemingly believed his own immense lies, a psychological disturbance that Jung recognized.  Only this accounts for Hitler's hypnotic power, when those who were not so enthralled often characterized him as an unimpressive and inarticulate man with an awful speaking voice.  His message--a New Order--thrilled those who believed themselves to be powerless, and played upon their own smoldering resentments and angers as well as their hopes.

The power of the unconscious is manifested today in the same way as then, as for example when obvious and evident falsehoods are apparently believed, and especially when the true factual information exposing them cannot get through.

For example, former UK Prime Minister David Cameron noted that Boris Johnson and other Brexit supporters were telling outrageous lies to convince voters to back the UK's exit from the European Union, while Cameron and other "remains" could not get through. As he told the Guardian, “I loved the explaining and arguing and that side of politics, persuasion, but then, as it went on, I just felt more and more bogged down. It turned into this terrible Tory psychodrama and I couldn’t seem to get through. What Boris and Michael Gove were doing was more exciting than the issues I was trying to get across. I felt like I was in a sort of quagmire by the end,” he said.

There are numerous examples of Trump's lies and corruption that were exposed before the election, and numerous warnings of the consequences of electing him.  Most voters didn't vote for him, but enough in the right places did--more than were expected or predicted.  It's likely that many prospective voters even lied to pollsters about both who they would vote for, and who they actually did vote for.
Mendacity ruled.

In both the UK and now in the US, an important step has recently been taken as their respective national legislatures have begun to stand up against the lying leaders and their abuses of power.  In both cases, events have brought things to a head, forcing their hands.  But legislators may also be feeling that the fever has broken, and the public can hear what they are saying.

These eruptions from a collective unconscious are inexplicable, partly because we are so ignorant and stupid about the unconscious.  It's easy enough to point to factors such as the rampaging gap between the rich and the rest--at an historic high in the US--and feelings of fear, suspicion and helplessness, brought on by immigration and desperate increases in refugees brought about ultimately (in many cases) by effects of the climate emergency.  But this is explanation afterwards--these factors need not produce the racist resurgence and proto-fascism we've been seeing, nor the authoritarian abuse of power.  It's natural to be shocked that it has been all in plain sight, but that is further evidence that the unconscious is profoundly involved.

The best we can hope for is that this particular eruption is settling down, as inexplicably perhaps as it began.  As the Brexit drama continues, and the US faces Trump's imminent impeachment, we'll see if this holds true.  If it doesn't, and the next elections don't reflect enough of such a reversal as to change the outcome, then these key democracies will be deeply wounded, and distracted enough that civilization will likely lose its last chance for a long future, if indeed it still has one.

But even if this eruption is calming, there will still be consequences and deep dangers, if Jung is any guide. Both the right and the left cast shadows.  Evil inspires evil, in both enemy and ally.  To a certain extent, Jung wrote, this is inevitable if justice is to prevail.  So even if we survive this eruption from the unconscious, our ignorance of it may mean the effective balance will be difficult to achieve.

In these essays about the collective unconscious, Jung stressed that ultimate responsibility is in the individual and that person's consciousness and unconscious.  We each must heal ourselves, regardless.

But Jung had high hopes for democracies characterized by diversity, and diverse points of view freely expressed.  Perhaps this has turned out to be not enough.  In the US we see that in certain places and certain spheres, the rightist analysis--whether accurate or not--holds sway, and enforces its shadow projections on the others.  And we also see that in certain places, on certain issues and in certain spheres, the leftist analysis--whether accurate or not--holds sway, and enforces its shadow projections on process.

It turns out that modern democracies also may amplify the human tendency to get along, which in a hierarchical society often means to follow the leader, and to get in line, or at the very least, keep your head down.  It also means sticking with your own kind, right or wrong.  Until the worm turns.  (So much about societies comes down to a march of cliches.)  The US is diverse, and there is unlikely to be consensus on much of anything.  Nevertheless, power shifts--and what happens afterwards shapes the future.

Things are happening fast in Washington.  It reminds me of Mailer's analysis of modern society as being like plastic--it looks perfectly intact, until it suddenly breaks and falls apart.  It may be too early to speculate on the response.  But wanted or not, the unconscious will be present.

Monday, September 23, 2019

Poetry Monday: Autumn Equinox


Autumn Equinox

One time I was almost ready to be born
before I had begun to remember
the palms of my hands had not yet unfurled
on the one tree of the whole of darkness
the tree before waiting the hearing tree
the left hand had not yet told the right hand
This is our time our season is now
the only time and you must wake and begin
to remember and to know who you are
you will come to remember but forgetting
comes on its own and you will try to tell what cannot be
told and you will have only
the old words and will try to use them
for the first time but the beginning
has gone from the words and there is no way
now to bring it back to them again
the right hand learns but the left hand is the prophet
Pain was waiting that time with her one key
long before the first daylight had appeared

W.S. Merwin
Garden Time