Thursday, December 30, 2021

R.I.P. in 2021

 

In the political world, the December death of Desmond Tutu was one of the latest to be widely noted.  Tutu was instrumental in forcing the world to confront the moral outrage of apartheid in South Africa, and after that white government fell, he worked to further inform the world, heal societal wounds and reconcile with the oppressors through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a visionary and still unique national response in the world of nation-states.

 Other noted deaths in the political realm include President Obama’s Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and two Senators who ran unsuccessfully for President, Democrat Walter Mondale and Republican Robert Dole. Also Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan and Chicago 7 defendant Rennie Davis, as well as two important labor leaders, John Sweeney and Richard Trumpka.

Leonard Crow Dog
 Not widely noted in the mainstream media were the deaths of Native American leaders, among them: Albert Hale, former president of Navajo Nation; Earl Old Person, chief and chairman of the Blackfeet Tribe and the longest serving tribal official in the US; Lakota medicine man and spiritual leader of the Wounded Knee protests Chief Leonard Crow Dog; activist Edgar Bear Runner, as well as Lee Marmon, whose photographs honored elders and others, mostly in his Laguna Pueblo, for some 60 years.


 In the arts and entertainment, memorable figures from  50s and 60s music include Don Everly, Lloyd Price, Charlie Watt (the Rolling Stones), Michael Nesmith (the Monkees), Mary Wilson (the Supremes), Gerry Marsden (Gerry and the Pacemakers), Jimmie Rodgers (his records were among the first I bought), as well as innovative pianist Chick Corea, and celebrated theatrical songwriter Stephen Sondheim.

 


In literature, poets Robert Bly and Lawrence Ferlinghetti each had defining roles in American poetry since 1950.  Novelists Larry McMurtry and Joan Didion, and best-selling authors in other areas such as E.O. Wilson, John Naisbitt and childrens’ authors Beverly Cleary and Norman Juster were among our losses in 2021.  (For more details and more authors, see Books in Heat.)

 Noted actors who died in 2021 included: Christopher Plummer, who quietly had an international career playing leading classic and popular parts on stage and screen that may never be equaled again.  I saw him on stage twice: in Boston, as the title character in the excellent Anthony Burgess adapation of Cyrano, and in Pittsburgh in a (then) less than inspiring production of Macbeth with Glenda Jackson in what turned out to be her last stage role.  Both productions went on to Broadway to great acclaim, if not long runs.  His memoir is exhaustive and informative with a light touch.


 Had he been American, Jean-Paul Belmondo’s matinee idol looks would have likely consigned him to big studio commercial movies, but in France he could carry both swashbucklers and films of lasting merit by Godard and Truffaut.  The French New Wave is inconceivable without him. 
Cecily Tyson, whose long career began on a short-lived TV series I loved, East Side/West Side starring George C. Scott. Ed Asner --I still sneak an episode of Lou Grant once in awhile; I also saw him perform live once in a play about the Scopes trial on evolution. Known mostly for his supporting role in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, for awhile in the 1970s, George Segal was a primary Hollywood leading man.  I liked him especially in Blume in Love.

  And Olympia Dukakis, Hal Holbrook, Cloris Leachman, Charles Grodin, Gavin MacLeod, Ned Beatty, Jane Withers, Jane Powell, Jessica Walter, Arlene Dahl, Anthony Sher, Yaphet Kotto, Norman Lloyd, Johnny Crawford…thanks for the memories.

 Directors we lost include Bernard Tavenier, Richard Donner (the first Christopher Reeve Superman remains a definitive American classic), Melvin van Peebles, and the—shall we say controversial—Lina Wertmuller. 

A film and television director who didn’t get his due was Michael Apted, who made fiction and documentary films about serious subjects, with taste and economy.  Best known for the “7 Up” series that followed a group of English children from 7 into adulthood every seven years, he directed such diverse features as Coal Miner’s Daughter, Gorky Park, Continental Divide, Gorillas in the Mist, Thunderheart, Blink, Enigma and Amazing Grace.  He also directed Bring on the Night, a documentary that followed the genesis of Sting’s first band and songs after he left the Police.  It’s a movie I can see again just about anytime.  It may be overall the best music documentary ever made. 

Walter Bernstein with director Martin Ritt on
the set of The Front
I also especially mark the passing of screenwriter Walter Bernstein.  Blacklisted in the 50s, he got to write a revelatory comedy about that phenomenon in the 70s, called The Front. I met him on the set of that film, and he was an engaging, funny and charming man as well as a witty writer, and an example of how social conscience and perseverance can be aided by a superior sense of humor.

 I also once had a conversation with brilliant and prickly humorist Mort Sahl that was less successful, but I did have the honor of watching him read a joke line I’d written on the Dick Cavett show. 

Never mind Lina Wertmuller—I had no idea Hans Kung was still alive until this year.  He was the daring young voice of reform in the Catholic Church at the time of the Vatican II Council when I was in Catholic high school in the early 60s. A priest even lent me his book on reform and reunion. Since then, it seems, he got into so much trouble for his views with Church hierarchy (after the death of John XXIII) that he described his experience as his own Inquisition. He lost various official posts but kept writing popular and influential books (although not so much in the U.S.), finding common ground among religions and championing the ecumenical spirit, while continuing to oppose church authoritarianism. 

 Star sports figures justly noted included Hank Aaron, Elgin Baylor and John Madden.  I remember Bill Virdon not only as a winning major league manager but as the dependably swift center fielder for the Pittsburgh Pirates who was kind to me.  As a kid I joined others on the Forbes Field diamond to meet our Pirates heroes.  I first shook hands with Roberto Clemente but he seemed distracted and bored, and didn’t look at me.  So I was a little embarrassed when I shook hands with Billy Virdon—until he looked me in the eye and said, “hello, son.”  

 

Among those we lost here on the North Coast was Clint Rebik, co-creator and artistic director of the Redwood Curtain theatre.  I knew Clint since that theatre began more than 20 years ago.  Besides being a talented actor and director, and in recent years a valued administrator at HSU, Clint was a model of integrity and kindness, generosity, good humor and judicious good sense.  I wrote about his theatre and their productions for a decade, though I was also there for their first night.  When I was unceremoniously dumped from my column, Clint reached out and assured me I would have a free seat there anyway. We did not know each other well, but for awhile we occasionally had coffee when I stopped by his Admissions office. He was widely admired in this community.  Clint was only 55.  He left behind two sons he loved, a partner and many friends.

 


Sam Oliner and his wife Pearl Oliner created the Altruistic Personality and Pro-Social Behavior Institute at Humboldt State University.  Each authored or co-authored many books on altruism, particularly in the context of Jews sheltered from the Nazis in World War II, as Sam had been as a child.  Their work pretty much created a whole new field of research, and offered an alternative to the dominant every-man-for-himself school of human social evolution.

 I met them when I did an article on their work, which includes many biographical details.  They were lovely people.  I had lunch with Sam a time or two, and I would see them walking in Arcata, hand in hand.  A few years ago, after their retirements, they moved down to the Bay Area to be closer to family.  They both died in 2021, a few months apart.

 May they all rest in peace.  Their work and their legacy lives on.

Monday, December 27, 2021

The Planet on the Table


The Planet on the Table

 Ariel was glad he had written his poems.
 They were of a remembered time
 Or of something seen that he liked.

 Other makings of the sun
 Were waste and welter
 And the ripe shrub writhed. 

 His self and the sun were one 
And his poems, although makings of his self,
 Were no less makings of the sun.

 It was not important that they survive.
 What mattered was that they should bear
 Some lineament or character, 

Some affluence, if only half perceived,
 In the poverty of their words,
 Of the planet of which they were part. 

 --Wallace Stevens

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

TV and Me: Serials to Cereals

 


Television and I grew up together.  This is our story.  Second of a series.

They were called television channels.  Programs flowed down them from broadcast stations into our eager eyes.  But for the producers of those programs they were river channels of time—of hours to be filled, from early morning to increasingly late at night.

 As it geared up to produce original programs, early television often relied on the ready-made: the stories already on film.  But the motion picture studios were not going to feed the competition if they could help it.  Major studies kept the movies that they owned under lock and key, until at least the middle years of the 1950s. 

 That left the old stock of lesser studios and independent productions, plus the expendable properties that nobody was going to pay to see in theatres: old short subjects and one-reelers, silent era comedy shorts, cartoons from the 1930s and 40s, old serials and some B movies—notably, westerns. 

 They all appeared on early TV. Even the most popular serial of all—the Buster Crabbe Flash Gordon—was reedited for 1950s TV.  But western serials and B features were particularly adaptable.  There were no old cars or obsolete technology or fashions of an earlier era, to tell viewers this was yesterday’s news.  

Westerns existed in their own time—a time created by Hollywood, beginning in the silent era of the 1920s.  By the 30s and 40s, mostly smaller studios specialized in them, turning them out by the hundreds.  They were rarely more than an hour in length, and were often shown at Saturday matinees. And they were popular. So they were perfect for filling those channels of TV time.

 We watched them all, after school and especially on Saturday morning: Johnny Mack Brown, Hoot Gibson, Tex Ritter, Gene Autry (and other “singing cowboys”), Whip Wilson and Lash LaRue, Tim McCoy and Tom Mix, an occasional Roy Rogers or an early John Wayne.  My mother marveled that through breakneck gallops and barroom brawls, the cowboys’ hats never fell off. That was by design: all the main characters wore hats so their stunt doubles could pass for them—their hats were essentially glued to their heads so you couldn’t see their faces.

 How these serials and movies were shown—sliced into half-hours or fifteen minute segments, surrounded by commercials, etc.—was mostly up to local stations that ran them.  So it happened that a silver-haired gentleman named William Boyd approached a local station in Los Angeles, offering them some western movies he owned.  He also happened to be the star of these movies.  He played Hopalong Cassidy.

 Bill Boyd was a lead actor in silent films in the 1920s, but as he approached 40 years old—and with his hair turning prematurely white—he wasn’t getting prime roles.  He heard about an independent producer planning a series of westerns, and lobbied hard for the lead role. In 1935, he became Hopalong Cassidy—in more ways that one.

 The character by that name in series of pulp novels by Clarence E. Mulford was a hard-drinking troublemaker, but Boyd pitched a new concept for him in the movies: he was clean-living, noble and heroic, and won the day with his intelligence as much as his fists and his six-gun.  This transformation of the character was the first of Boyd’s amazingly good decisions. Another was realizing that he needed to support the character’s image by toning down the wilder side of his own nature.  He made himself into a role model, on and off screen. 

The classic Hoppy is pretty much there—maybe a little meaner-- from the beginning of what turned into a series of 66 films. No attempt is made to hide his silver hair.
  In fact, it was accentuated by his black outfit and hat.  This was against the Hollywood western cliche—the bad guy wore the black hat.  But Hoppy didn’t go too far: his horse (Topper) was white.

 The Hoppy films were a cut above the usual serial or B movie western.  Movie theatre owners noticed and began playing some as features.  Boyd cajoled studios into spending more, and took pay cuts to finance better quality stories and production.  These movies excelled in cinematography and the scenery where they were typically shot, at Lone Pine, California, in the foothills of Mt. Whitney.  It all seemed to pay off: in surveys of the most popular western stars in the late 30s and early 40s, Hopalong was in the top three, along with Gene Autry and Roy Rogers.

 But in 1943 the film series producer decided the Hoppy series was played out. Then Bill Boyd made his next brilliant decision.  He spent everything he had and could raise to buy both the rights to the character and the old films.  He made twelve more Hoppy features for theatres between 1946 and 1948, with smaller budgets.  That’s when he offered his old films to an NBC affiliate in Los Angeles, to run on TV.

 The Hopalong films quickly became popular, but Bill Boyd and NBC had another idea: Hopalong Cassidy would be the first western hero to make the transition to a television series.  It began airing on June 24, 1949, just days before my third birthday. 

 By the time I was four, Hopalong Cassidy was a national sensation, and I was hooked. William Boyd became the first national television star. Hopalong was on the cover of Life Magazine, Look and Time. 

That following Christmas, when I was four and a half, my most prized gifts were an authentic Hopalong gun and holster set, plus a less than authentic Hopalong suit and hat. (That's me in the top photo, defending my almost one year old sister Kathy.) Eventually I would have a Hopalong toy chest, a Hopalong record, and probably other items. In total there would be some 2600 different Hopalong-themed or endorsed products. (Hoppy lunch boxes started a lasting trend.)  Radio and film heroes and perhaps one or two other TV heroes at that time generated products and “premiums,” but nothing like this.  This started it all. 

So I wasn’t the only one with a Hopalong Christmas.  It was so common that the classic song, “It’s Beginning to Look A Lot Like Christmas,” written by Meredith Wilson in 1951 and originally recorded by Perry Como and Bing Crosby, includes the lyrics: “A pair of Hopalong boots and a pistol that shoots/ is the wish of Barney and Ben...” 

 Hoppy was so ubiquitous that he was the subject of my grandfather’s Italian/English pun.  A common greeting among my grandfather and his friends was, “Che si dice?” pronounced K-sa-deech. It’s the equivalent of, “what do you say?”   When I was in my Hoppy phase as a child, my grandfather would greet me: “Hey, Hopalong Che si dice!” 

Contradictory sources make the actual broadcast history of Hopalong Cassidy a little hazy.  But there seem to have been only 52 half hour episodes made, though they likely ran repeatedly until at least the mid-1950s.  Twelve of these were edited down from the  last dozen theatrical films Boyd made.  Then he added 40 new half hour television episodes.

 By the time the first 12 shows had aired, Boyd knew exactly who his audience was: me, and children more or less my age. So to the new episodes he appended a brief coda.  Arrayed in his Hoppy outfit, appearing to be reading a book or writing at his desk, he offered brief homilies to his “little partners.”  Judging from the subjects—wash your ears, go to bed when you’re told to, and above all listen to your mummy and daddy—he judged the majority to be at the lower end of the four to twelve years age group.  (Hoppy also promised parents that he only endorsed quality, safe products, and this has been reported to be true—Bill Boyd personally reviewed all offers.  He also refused to make very popular personal appearances if children were charged admission.)   

Hoppy appearance in Denver 1954
Watching these episodes now, digitally cleaned up for DVD, it isn’t entirely clear why we loved them at such a young age.  Their stories were often fairly complex.  Hoppy was mostly more of a detective using his brain than a gunslinger. He might casually deck a bad guy with his fists, and he sometimes shot one, though that became increasingly rare as the series progressed. 

 There were always action sequences—but action in the 1950s sense: horseback chases, runaway buckboards and stage coaches, frequent gunfights with cowboys shooting at each other from a distance—and Hoppy arriving in the nick of time.  I’m sure we found these exciting.

 Mostly I think it was Hoppy himself.  There was something magical about the tall lanky man in black, and the way he carried himself.  Seeing these again, I recalled the neckerchief he wore with the steer head clasp (I probably had one.)  But above all I remembered his voice and his laugh.  I remember trying to imitate the Hoppy chuckle.

 His age never registered (Boyd was in fact almost as old as my grandfather.)  But something paternal probably did.  He could look mean (Boyd’s sneer was more prominent in the movies) and he could be sarcastic with his sidekicks, but he could also be gentle and generous.  He smiled a lot.  From the start of the new episodes, Hoppy was often coming to the rescue of an adolescent or child.

 How much of these stories could I understand at four or five?  In cutting down movies from more than 60 minutes to under 30, Boyd used extensive voice-overs to summarize missing elements of the story.  He refined this technique for the television episodes, so that Hoppy was often shown merely looking, or thinking, while that silvery voice talked only to us. This allowed for more complex stories in the allotted time, so they hold up pretty well.  But I wonder how much we understood.

 The stories often involved Hoppy coming to the aid of victims of the unscrupulous.  As often as not, the bad guys were bankers and men of position.  Hoppy championed the unprotected, and even if I couldn’t follow financial details and so on, I probably got that much.

Duncan Rinaldo and Bill Boyd
 Hopalong Cassidy was the first film to television western series, and also the first made for television western.  Seeing its success, other networks got interested.  Very quickly, ABC aired The Lone Ranger (1949), starring Clayton Moore, and The Cisco Kid, starring Duncan Renaldo, went into syndication (1950.) They were the epics of our early childhood. (Moore, Renaldo and Boyd were all friends. Moore even dropped the mask to appear in several Hoppy episodes, once as a villain.)

 The Cisco Kid was based on an O. Henry character, and called the Robin Hood of the West.  Pancho (played by Leo Carrillo, who unlike Boyd and others was actually an accomplished rider) was Cisco’s comical sidekick (“Let’s went!”) and they eventually had a conversation at the end of their brief adventure which they ritually ended by saying, “O Pancho!”  “O Cisco!” and laughing. 

The Lone Ranger was very popular on radio, and Clayton Moore as the masked rider of the plains deepened his voice accordingly.  Jay Silverheels as his Indian companion Tonto played the part with unfailing dignity—he was just about the only sidekick who wasn’t comical.  They also championed the weak and oppressed.  

(What everyone of a certain age remembers is the opening narration to The Lone Ranger.  Oddly, none of the available episodes use the whole thing. It didn't appear until after the first season or two, and apparently later syndicated episodes cut it back.)

 While it’s true that among the Western movies that made it to TV were enough “cowboys and Indians” scenes to make that a cliche of the form, but it seems less recognized that Hopalong Cassidy and other early television westerns mostly did not take the same attitude.  In every Hoppy episode featuring American Indians, they are the victims of unscrupulous whites.  The same is true of The Long Ranger.  In fact, that’s the theme of both of the original Lone Ranger feature films. 

Guy Madison as Wild Bill
Other western movie stars also got themselves television shows, notably Gene Autry (1950) and Roy Rogers (1951.).  And the floodgates opened for new TV westerns, such as two of my favorites, The Range Rider and The Adventures of Wild Bill Hickok (I especially liked their fringe jackets) both in 1951.  Most of them wound up being sponsored by breakfast cereal companies, and so memories of Guy Madison’s Wild Bill Hickok arrive flavored with Sugar Pops.

 Non-Western movie serials also made the transition to TV cereal (Buck Rogers, for example, and a weird postwar German-made Flash Gordon with an American actor as Flash and Germans as the villains.) One that featured the same lead actor in both film and TV was Dick Tracy, starring Ralph Byrd in 1950-51. 

Watching a specific episode of this series is actually one of my early memories, at five years old or so. In the story, the bad guys got the drop on Tracy and took away his gun.  But he outsmarted them because he had a second gun they didn’t find.  I remember leaving the room, thinking about this clever ploy.

 But stories that already existed on film alone could not completely fill up those channels of time. Most of that time in early television was taken up by something that made it unique, and yet also related to past forms.  It is an element that television rarely relied on again, and today’s viewers almost never see.  Because most of early television was live.

 What time is it, kids?  Next time.

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Dreaming


White Christmas

The sun is shining, the grass is green,
 The orange and palm trees sway. 
There's never been such a day in Beverly Hills, L.A.
 But it's December the twenty-fourth,— 
And I am longing to be up North— 

 I'm dreaming of a White Christmas
 Just like the ones I used to know
 Where the treetops glisten and children listen
 To hear sleigh bells in the snow.

 I'm dreaming of a white Christmas
 With every Christmas card I write
 May your days be merry and bright
 And may all your Christmases be white.

--words and music by Irving Berlin

 “White Christmas” by Irving Berlin is probably the first modern Christmas song. He wrote it for a stage musical which instead became the movie, Holiday Inn, released in 1942. Reputedly he said it was not only the best song he’d ever written, but the best song anybody had ever written. It is sometimes noted that Berlin’s son died on Christmas day in 1928.

 It took awhile for the song to catch on, but it was a hit by the time the Academy Awards presented it the Oscar for best original song. Bing Crosby, who first sang it on the radio, shortly after Pearl Harbor in December 1941, had the initial hit record, which by some reckoning is the biggest selling single of all time. But many others have recorded it—some years back I created a pretty good collage of versions by Crosby, Frank Sinatra, Perry Como, Ella Fitzgerald and a choral version, which fortunately were all in the same key. There have been many more recent versions, and the song has been a hit as recently as 2020.

 Crosby starred in Holiday Inn and sang the song as a duet with Marjorie Reynolds, and then sang it solo in another movie, White Christmas, in 1954. That movie—in VistaVision color-- also starred Danny Kaye and Rosemary Clooney. If I didn’t have a crush on her before, I did after that movie. I must have seen Holiday Inn shortly before that as well. 

 I was in the third grade in 1954. I saw the sheet music for “White Christmas” on my uncle Carl’s piano at my grandparents, and I read the lyrics, which begin with the set-up that is almost never sung (even less often than the opening to “Pennies From Heaven.”) The idea of being somewhere that it doesn’t snow for Christmas fascinated me. It was the subject of my first play, started as a class assignment and finished out of sheer exuberance. It was called “A Summer Christmas,” about a family (a very 1950s situation comedy family) coping with a Christmas without snow (until, of course, at the last minute, it does snow.) My fellow third graders performed it, and were its audience.

 A Christmas without snow was barely imaginable to me in western Pennsylvania in 1954. Now I live in California, but it is becoming normal for many other places now to see Christmas and winter without snow. Much of the world I knew is gone, and much of the rest of it is going.

 This lyric (just nine lines repeated) is really about nostalgia for an image of Christmas—one that just about guarantees disappointment in its reality. (The word “white” has complicated connotations these days as well.) But some of the images evoke moments in memory, and for this—as well as the history this song represents—it’s become an inevitable part of the season, at least if you’ve lived through some of this history. And you remember snow.

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

History of My Reading: To Stony Creek and Buffalo 1969-70

Stony Creek, Connecticut 1969/70.  BK photo.

 After my months in Berkeley, I flew to Chicago in late October or early November 1969.  I visited for a few days with Jeremy Gladstone (a friend from Knox College) who was back from Europe and staying at the family home in Park Forest until he sorted out his next move.  In Europe Jeremy had acquired a taste for Pernod, one of the anise-based French liqueurs, a legal form of absinthe.  He showed me how to drink it over ice, with water.

  One evening he invited a group of former Knox friends, and initiated them as well.  I’m pretty sure Howard Partner was among them.  We sat around a table drinking Pernod.  I think it was on this occasion that I got a better appreciation for how far apart these Chicagoland suburbs really are.  It took longer for everyone to get there and to get back than the time we spent together.

 My next stop was the family home in Greensburg.  This was likely a short visit because I was soon on my way to rejoin Joni in Connecticut.  I got myself there by first going to Washington for the second Moratorium demonstration against the Vietnam War on November 15.  This turned out to be officially the largest Washington demonstration of the war.  I may have gone down with my friend Mike or maybe I met him there because he was stationed nearby.  He had been drafted into the Army the year before.  So I marched against the war in the company of an active duty soldier (or in his case, chaplain’s assistant.) 

Many demonstrators from distant places came on rented buses, and so my plan was to find a bus returning to New Haven and hitch a ride. Not really a mad strategy in 1969.  In any case, the plan worked. Mike and I found a bus going to New Haven and they had empty seats.  I even got acquainted with someone on the bus who offered to put me up for the night when I couldn’t reach Joni upon our arrival.  In the morning I met his wife, and he and I traded versions of Dylan’s “Girl From the North Country” (I knew the Nashville Skyline version in G, he knew the original version in C.) Then I called Joni again and she came to pick me up.

 Joni had found a small place in a village called Stony Creek, directly on Long Island Sound, about eight miles from New Haven.  As I recall, it was three rooms in a building set back from the main drag, Thimble Island Road.  Though oysters and lobster fishing were part of its identity, the “stony” in Stony Creek likely came from the quarry.  Before it closed at the beginning of the 20th century, it supplied pink granite for the Brooklyn Bridge, Grand Central Terminal in Manhattan, and the base of the Statue of Liberty.

Probably Thimble Island Road.  BK photo.
 With a population of about a thousand, Stony Creek was part of the town of Branford, Connecticut.  An article I clipped from the New York Times a decade later began with the quip of an unnamed critic: “Every town has its village idiot, but only Branford has an idiot village.”  This article made much of Stony Creek’s resistance to change; specifically to tourism.  I don’t know if it’s still that way, though photos on line don’t give me that impression.

 The 1979 Times article suggested that many residents were employed at Yale, and perhaps that was the case to some extent also in 1969.  Across the Sound from Stony Creek there were houses where groups of Yale Law students lived.  One of them was named Bill Clinton. His girlfriend Hillary was often around.  Joni’s brother-in-law was at Yale Law, and she attended a party over there sometime before I’d arrived.  Perhaps they met. 

I don't know if it was a cultural high point but in the late 1930s, Stony Creek had a summer theatre, operated by two women who also interned for the legendary Mercury Theatre in New York, run by John Houseman and Orson Welles, often the star in its productions.  This is how Stony Creek hosted a Mercury Theatre show for a week prior to its Broadway debut. Unfortunately the tryout was so dismal that the show never opened--only those who came to Stony Creek, like Katharine Hepburn, ever saw it. She stole one of the actors, Joseph Cotton, for her 1939 Broadway hit, The Philadelphia Story, which revived her career. 

That New York Times article sings the praises of Stony Creek in summer, but I saw it only in the dead of winter, intermittently from November through February (with some time back in Greensburg for Christmas, which extended well into January to avoid Joni’s parents, visiting her and her sister.  They were not my allies.) 

BK
 Still, even though it was dim and frigid (or sunny and slushy) much of the time, I liked our corner of Stony Creek by the Sound. The Sound wasn’t the ocean but it was something, and it was always there.  I wrote this about it:

 Dredging the gray sky,/the winter wind sears home./Against the window/it pours/stinging rain from the sea./Though it does not leap into the warm kitchen/I go out to meet it/greet it/say hello/and come back in.

 Something about that dynamic suited me then, and still does. Besides the Sound, there was very little else in Stony Creek, at least within walking distance, except farther down Thimble Island Road there was a small store--and a public library.  It was (and is) the Willoughby Wallace Library, built in 1956 thanks to a bequest by the eccentric but public-spirited Mr. Wallace, plus an architect’s donated design, and donated town granite.  

So this bright substantial building was pretty new when I discovered it, amazed it was there.  I was inside it just after 3 in the afternoon, and found it was a prime hangout for high school students after school.  They sat around sunny tables, munching candy from the store and debriefing the day: who got in trouble on the bus that morning, who got ripped last weekend, plus demonstrations of how Martha and Jennifer walk. (As well as casting suspicious glances at the possible narc with the long hair, taking notes.)

 Around 4, they were replaced by a noisy bunch of grade schoolers.  “I wonder what menstruation means?”  I watched a third grader look over a Jimi Hendrix album.  Others laughed over the magazines, or broke into whispery, gossipy groups. 

 The library became my regular destination—walking past the abandoned offices of Pacific Sanchero, Permittee, and the house with the multicolored design painted by a summer tenant, who also inscribed on its wall “Latch onto a feather.”  In relatively good weather, I could sit on a stone bench outside, if it wasn’t already occupied by the aforementioned students.

 It was in this library that I discovered an author I would follow for the rest of his life: Ronald Sukenick. Very likely his latest book was on display, with a title bound to catch my eye: Death of the Novel and Other Stories.  (The “death of the novel” was a thing, long before—and much different than-- the death of the author.) 

Sukenick
The stories amazed me—I hadn’t read anything like them before.  Today some might qualify as “metafiction,” or be called deconstruction.  At the time they felt to be attempts to find new forms commensurate with the current fractious and fractured reality, as well as further forays in expanding the possibilities of writing by essentially playing with some of those possibilities.  These stories were basically comic, and in a sense conventional—the experiments were part of the story, as for example, when he includes a transcript of a conversation with his wife with a tape recorder between them.  When the conversation becomes uncomfortable for him, he wants to turn the tape off.  (At least that’s how I remember it, from a re-reading ten years ago or so.)

 So I was delighted to find in the library stacks a copy of his novel, Up, published the previous year.  It also played with narrative—the initial character was a writer, so part of it is about a character he’s writing (Strop Banally), including the changes he’s making along the way (the character’s hair color, etc.)  It also threads other narratives, but again includes critiques of their discontinuities and excesses as part of the story.

 Sukenick seemed only a little older, and I immediately bonded with our similarities in outlook and literary attempts, ignoring many differences.  Writing conventional narrative seemed superficial and false to many in those nuclear psychedelic Vietnam Nixonated days.  I didn’t get all he was doing or trying to do, but I was attracted to the mosaic form and the irreverent style I’d been drawn to in the Beatles, Vonnegut, Donleavy, Joseph Heller, etc.

My Sukenick collection, minus "Mosaic," hiding somewhere
 But Sukenick became a hard author to follow—even as a reader.  Those first two books were from major publishers, but subsequent ones were from small presses, including the organization he helped to start, the Fiction Collective.  At least a few times I found his books on carts of university bookstores sale books.  I found his 1986 novel Blown Away (Sun and Moon Press) deep in a pile of discount books on my last visit to the Harvard Coop bookstore.  But I managed to get copies of all of his novels, and one collection of stories.  I still have most of them, including his last, easily the best fiction I’ve read about 9/11, Last Fall.  I even have his extremely useful book on Wallace Stevens, Musing the Obscure, from his earlier life as a very perceptive and methodical literary scholar.  He died in 2004.

 Sukenick was a named character in Up, and the novel followed other characters (his boyhood friends mostly) who also were a little older than me.  There were retrospective scenes from their past, though I wasn’t much interested in them at the time. (Now they seem vivid.) What impressed me was that this was contemporary fiction about contemporary times and people.  Characters smoked dope and talked about revolution (though usually their complicated reasons for supporting it and not supporting it simultaneously.)  They were out of school (though some were teaching) and trying to find a place in a society they feared and loathed. That got my attention, as I was just beginning that journey.

 When I wasn’t in Stony Creek, I was in New Haven, a 20 minute bus ride away.  My efforts to find a job—desperate, muddled and halfhearted simultaneously-- were focused there. I checked bulletin boards and the newspapers, including the Yale student paper. 

 In one of those papers I saw an ad for volunteers for a Yale psychology department experiment “in learning” that paid $25 for a few hours.  I called the number and asked for more information on what this experiment entailed.  My first suspicion was that it involved drugs, and at this point in my life I wasn’t eager to let others experiment on me. The female voice on the other end assured me there were no drugs but when I asked other questions she was persistently evasive. That turned my suspicions into alarm bells.  As much as I needed the money, I didn’t participate.

 Years later I realized that this was very probably an early iteration of the famous (or infamous) Milgram experiments. (This was pretty much confirmed for me in a book by psychologist Elliot Aronson when he described what subjects were told the experiments were about—precisely what that ad said.) 

The Milgram experiments were one of the most often cited psychology experiments of modern times.  Participants were instructed to give electric shocks to people in the next room if they answer questions incorrectly.  With each wrong answer the shock is intensified, until the victim can be heard screaming in pain and begging to be released from the experiment. The victims weren’t actually getting shocks—they were in on the con.  The experiments weren’t about learning; they were to see how many people will follow instructions and administer the shocks, even after hearing cries of pain and the begging. 

 The answer was a shockingly high percentage of them.  I first heard it reported as 100%.  Later the figure given for those willing to administer the maximum voltage was 64%.  The experiment is usually said to prove two main points: that people will do what authority tells them to do, and that people will do so in situations even if they believe that they wouldn’t, regardless of their personal ethics.

 But here’s the problem.  To make such an inference about people in general, the participants had to accurately represent the population.  This is the fatal flaw of most such psychological experiments (participants are mostly students who always need money, and overwhelmingly white.) In this experiment, those who actually participated had to be willing to take the unquestioned word of authorities, without knowing what they were getting into, just to walk in the door. So they were self-selected pre-disposed. But how many people like me smelled something fishy and just didn’t participate?  On the other hand, how many participants needed the $25 enough to do what they were told?

 Think about it: this was Yale in 1969 and 1970.  There were antiwar protests on campus.  William Sloane Coffin, an advocate for defying the draft and therefore the authority of the government, was a campus hero.  Part of the huge generation gap was the distrust many younger people had for the honesty and veracity of those in authority in the government, the university  and big business.  Scientific research secretly funded by the military was a big issue on many campuses.

 So if you were against the killing and the maiming in Vietnam, to the extent of resisting the government’s orders to do so, or even if you were a stoned peace and love hippie, how likely is it that you were going to push a button to cause somebody pain?  I’ve seen photos of these experiments—there was no long hair, no countercultural clothing in any of them. 

 (These experiments, now considered unethical, are often cited along with the equally notorious Stanford  experiments that purported to prove that people given the role of prison guard invariably act in sadistic ways towards prisoners.  This was a much-cited finding in the corporate world of the 1980s and 1990s, though the experiments have largely been discredited.) 

My perspective on the Milgram experiments led to my skepticism of many psychological experiments, and books about them.  I found support in the work of eminent psychologist Jerome Kagan, particularly in his book Psychology’s Ghosts: The Crisis in the Profession and the Way Back, in which he gently but definitely questioned whether universal conclusions about behavior can be based on small numbers of culturally identical subjects in a laboratory setting.

 In any case, the stark divide in the late 1960s was something I keenly felt.  Even before the Pentagon Papers or Watergate, there was amply evidence of systematic lying in high places.  All our literature, movies and music questioned the moral authority if not the intelligence of those running things.  Apart from my ignorance of how the “adult world” worked, and how I could possibly find my way into the elements of it I still respected, my general attitude was both baffled and adversarial.  How could I make a living, and not lose myself?  I had too much yet to learn.

 “Out of college, money spent,” went the Beatles’ lyric, “see no future, pay no rent/all the money’s gone, nowhere to go.  But oh that magic feeling/ no where to go...”

 Apart from visits to my Knox friend Mike Shain, who for some reason now forgotten was living in a New Haven rooming house, with a sign on his door that said “Home of the Bobby Dylan Conspiracy,” I gravitated towards Yale. The academic campus was still the only industrial site I knew, and where I was somewhat comfortable.  I went to readings and knew how to get myself invited to the parties afterwards.  I believe that’s where I heard poet Kenneth Koch read.

He read a long poem that may have been called “Eyes.” In any case, it was my inspiration for a long poem I later wrote called “Ears,” which was published a couple of times in the mid-70s.

  I heard the poet Bill Knott, who at the time was writing under the name of St. Geraud.  I was astounded by his poems—they were the most unrelenting and mind-blowing surrealist poems I’d encountered. Also very short.  He may have read on the same bill with Koch or perhaps another poet, because I remember him being at the after-party and he left without much notice. Later I happened to be in the living room of this house when the doorbell rang and I answered it.  It was Bill Knott, looking shamefaced about returning.  I laughed.  I loved it.

 I met poet Michael Benedikt and we began a correspondence when he was back in New York.  He was interested in my writing that I sent him. This was some rare encouragement.  I was still sending things out and getting them back.

 Thinking back, it seems obvious that this would have been a good moment for a mentor to appear in my life. But it didn’t happen then, and never happened.  I later depended greatly on the faith of several editors, but they were all more or less my contemporaries.  This, like everything else, was as much my fault as anyone’s, and equally a sign of the times. 

I did manage a fair amount of writing at Stony Creek. Apart from verse and short fiction, and the usual endless notes on the novel I wasn’t writing, I once simply let go and wrote a sustained prose fiction called “Apostrophe S.”  Influenced by Sukenick but more by Vonnegut in its tone, I wrote it late at night, in the warm quiet kitchen, while Joni was asleep. I often had the company of our two kittens, named Abbey and Rhoda, who prowled around the pale plywood plank I was writing on, and chased my pen across the yellow legal pad.

 What survives of “Apostrophe S” seems to include elements added later.  Perhaps a wise editor could have helped me develop the good parts (some were quite funny) into something publishable, but in retrospect, the best part of it is remembering the experience of writing it. 

 But I did write something while at Stony Creek that was more of an indication of a direction I would later follow.  It’s not much remembered, but in late 1969, there was a brief but intense frenzy over an assertion that Paul McCartney had died in a car crash some three years before, and been secretly replaced by a lookalike.  Then the Beatles had seeded various songs with clues.  This “Paul is dead” theory led to top 40 stations all over America airing the “evidence” as well as lots of Beatles songs.  It made the news (Huntley-Brinkley, Time Magazine) and a New Haven moviehouse advertised a special showing of Yellow Submarine with the line, “Paul is alive and well in Yellow Submarine!”  Sales of Beatles albums shot up.

 But what apparently impressed me most was how seriously the high school students I saw in Stony Creek were taking it.  I realized that this was a contemporary subject of interest to my generation and younger that I knew something about, both in terms of the Beatles and what are now known as “conspiracy theories.”  The long piece I wrote about it, entitled the “The Paul Is Dead Theology,” was the kind of cultural reportage and analysis that in the not too distant future I would be writing and publishing.  But at that moment, though Michael Benedikt especially liked it and tried to get it published, it only joined my manuscript pile of futility.

 The article asserted knowledge concerning what high school students were talking about that I probably didn’t derive just from hanging around the Stony Creek library.  Joni was teaching high school, and we talked about her students.

We had happy times in Stony Creek. The music I associate with those wintry days includes the Band albums and The Papas and the Mamas, especially the song "Safe in my Garden." But our garden was not so safe. Our problem was the future, and the nature of our future together. These issues were the sources of tension, and along with external and internal pressures, were more than an undercurrent to those months.  But as far as I knew we’d come to no conclusion. 

Stony Creek sunset. BK photo.
Apart from manuscripts, I’d sent out various proposals, applications and inquiries.  I applied for a summer arts workshop at Cummington, in western Massachusetts.  I was in touch with Knox friend Steve Meyers who was in graduate school in Buffalo.  He was enthusiastic about the English department there, and urged me to come up and check things out. Perhaps I’d come to the reluctant conclusion that I didn’t know how to do anything that paid a salary except maybe teach, and if I was going to have to make a living that way, I would need an advanced degree.  Or maybe I was just looking for some income for a few years, burrowed into books.

 So one cold March morning I slid a duffel bag and my guitar case into the front trunk of Joni’s yellow VW bug. We drove first to the dump in a frozen field of thin snow, and I unloaded a bag of garbage.  I got back into the car and she drove me to an interstate ramp, so I could begin hitchhiking up to Buffalo.  After a brief farewell, she drove away.  It would be the last time I saw her.

 Shortly after I got to Steve’s in Buffalo, her letter arrived inviting me not to come back.  Over the next weeks we talked on the phone a few times and exchanged letters, but the situation didn’t change.  I was dislocated and bereft on many levels, but I don’t think I really blamed her. I certainly saw the justice of her point of view. 

 If Sukenick’s Up has a theme it would probably be to “be true to the discontinuity of experience.”  Even then, the 60s seemed an especially discontinuous and contingent time, so it seemed writing should express it.  But discontinuity is also a theme of youth.  All experience that falls outside the expected, the changes and rapid twists and turns, especially when moving among “worlds” of what passes for the traditional or normal and what seems to be new, as well as crossing undefined geographical, socio-economic (class) and other borders, is experienced as discontinuous.  It’s only later that it’s possible to sense the patterns, the continuities, even if they never become entirely clear, or they are multiple.

 There may be accidents or missed opportunities or stupid moves and so on, the memory of which may keep us up at night, but ultimately they become elements in the pattern.  For example, had a certain letter arrived a few days earlier when I was in Berkeley, my life might have taken me in a different direction, perhaps to western Canada.  And so on.  Or as we said a lot in those days, so it goes.

 In a way that’s what this project is about: partly through the agency of reading, seeing where things fall into the pattern that time has made, that can only be seen retrospectively.  In a larger sense, that’s a project of old age. 

 Events of all kinds contribute to the pattern—things that happened and did not happen, as well as things read or thought or felt or heard or seen, or desired, or feared. The influence of others at a particular time, or the lack of it. The picture will never be complete, because memory and various kinds of records of the time are almost guaranteed to be incomplete, if not distorting.  But it’s pretty clear what the pattern is of: it’s how you got to where you end up.

Virgil Thomson (r)
 Sometime in the early 1990s, I had the television on, not entirely absorbed in what I think was a documentary film about the American composer Virgil Thomson.  There was a brief scene, apparently filler, of Thomson at a party. He was talking to a young man, who I imagine was troubled about his career or his life.  Thompson was looking at him intently, and said very carefully and earnestly: “The outcome of everything is the way it happens, and the way it happens is the story of your life.”

 It took me awhile to accept this but that’s the pattern.  That’s the retrospective continuity: the story of your life. And as I am finding now, it begins to become visible when the story is pretty much over, and you’re in the coda, or maybe the last act.

 In Buffalo it was still winter.  I slept in Steve’s living room, for longer than I intended.  Simon and Garfunkel’s Bridge Over Troubled Water album had come out, and I learned the first song on the second side, “The Only Living Boy in New York.”  I played it so much that a friend of Steve’s thought I’d written it.  I also liked “Papa Hobo” from that record.  Together they represented my moment. 

Bobbie and Bob Creeley
The only reading I remember was from the bookshelf in that living room: several books by William Carlos Williams, notably his essays In The American Grain.

I must have also been reading Robert Creeley’s newer poetry, since he was teaching in Buffalo, and I was seeing a lot of him.  I attended at least one of his classes, spoke with him in his office, and was at an epic party in which, at one end of the host apartment, Robert Creeley held court, surrounded by others, and at the other end, his wife Bobbie Creeley was equally the center of attention.  When Bob mentioned Bobbie's enthusiasm for palmistry and I held up my liberally creased hand, he immediately sent me to Bobbie (later known as writer and artist Bobbie Louise Hawkins), who, as predicted, exulted in the challenge.  

 I was deliberately spending time at the English department building, particularly one long row of offices, belonging to (among others) poet John Logan, fictionist John Barth, and literary critic and gadfly Leslie Fiedler, as well as Creeley.  I learned enough about them to find the ways they decorated the window in the door to their offices appropriately expressive.  Logan’s window looked like stained glass, Fiedler’s was psychedelic, Barth’s was blacked out, and Creeley’s was clear.

 I met a lot of people in the department, as well as other of Steve’s friends, especially at the almost weekly huge communal meals.  Steve remembers that we both brought guitars to a class he was teaching and improvised a song with lyrics by T.S. Eliot.   

 But it was also a moment of crisis for SUNY Buffalo, eventually including street demonstrations.  After awhile police of various kinds were called in, and there was barricades and tear gas.  Steve and I mostly listened to the reports each evening on the campus radio station.  But we also attended meetings, including a big one of the faculty (that included graduate TAs) in the College of Arts and Letters.   The issues were wide-ranging, including academic freedom (unjustified suspensions of faculty) and others I’ve frankly forgotten. 

Leslie Fiedler
 Leslie Fiedler spoke about how serious it was to call for the resignation of a university president—and why he was calling for it now. A resolution of no confidence passed overwhelmingly (according to my notebook.) Then a student came in shouting that police were on their way to a particular campus building, and so all of us marched arm in arm to that building, where nothing happened.

 There was another moment I had reason to remember later.  Before the meeting started, someone behind us cautioned that people chatting with each other needed to be careful what they said because there were probably FBI undercover agents in the crowd.  What seemed a tad paranoid though not crazy turned out to be broadly true, when the extent of FBI infiltration of antiwar and related groups was revealed.  Some agents were even provocateurs, pushing radical groups to violence.

 I’d never entertained participating in premeditated political violence, and I was skeptical of its benefits versus its human and moral costs. My attitudes towards “revolution” were also complicated. I was selective in what I felt needed to change, and how to go about obtaining that change.  Some of these attitudes were not quite conscious, so I learned something from a moment in Buffalo.

 Richard Ellmann, author of the biography of James Joyce that had meant so much to me, was teaching at the university (though I never met him.)  But I read somewhere that his collection of Joyce memorabilia was on display that month at the university library.

When I went to see it, I couldn’t find it.  A library official asked if he could help me, and when I told him, he said that unfortunately the display had to be put back in storage because of the ongoing strife in the streets.  He must have seen my expression of dismay—I’d never dreamed that angry students would sack the library but at the same time, it didn’t seem like an outrageous precaution.  And I suppose that, with my long hair and jeans, I was a bit ashamed to be a cause of such anxiety.  But he saw right away that I was a Joyce enthusiast, and sympathized.  

SUNY Buffalo campus
At some point in my Buffalo exile, I made a trip over the Canadian border for a quick visit with Bill Thompson, my former housemate our senior year at Knox.  I met his friends from the University of Hamilton where he was (or had been) a graduate student.  So cold and insistent was the Buffalo winter that it actually was warmer in Canada.

 It was at the University of Hamilton that I had my first exposure to what was then called Women’s Liberation.  I attended an open forum on the subject, run with  authority by leaders of a campus Women’s Liberation organization.  It was an eye-opener, or as we would soon learn to say, a consciousness-raiser.  A lot of their points I experienced as valid immediately, and others it took a short while to admit.  I was troubled however by how the women leaders treated a woman in the audience, who said she didn’t think women had to have a career to feel liberated or be fulfilled—she felt liberated working in her garden.  They fell on her like a ton of bricks.  Today it seems like a first iteration of the “woke” moment: it’s liberating side, and it’s tyrannical side.

 

I was still in Buffalo in April (where it was still winter), for the very first Earth Day.  Some 20 million Americans marched or otherwise participated.  It was a big deal.  (I wrote more about this here.)  I heard Ralph Nader speak, and engaged a garage mechanic in a conversation about how ecology could generate jobs. 

 In general Buffalo had calmed down in late April, until President Nixon announced the U.S. incursion into Cambodia, widening the Vietnam war. The university, along with colleges across the country, immediately erupted.  On May 4th, National Guard troops shot and killed four Kent State students.  The war, it seemed, had come home.  There were larger protests at even more colleges, and a national student strike. For those of us a little older, Kent State crystallized a feeling we’d had for years: that we were enemies in our country.

 The University of Buffalo was shut down, and Steve and I spontaneously decided to head back to Knox College in Illinois, perhaps from some homing instinct in this crisis time.

 I had miraculously (and largely through the efforts of Robert Creeley, I’m convinced) been accepted into the SUNY Buffalo graduate English program for the following fall.  But I no longer saw myself staying there. Whatever I was going to do or be next, it wasn’t going to be in academia after all.  In the immediate sense I’d abused Steve’s hospitality for too long.  So I knew I wasn’t going back to Buffalo.

 I had also been accepted at the Cummington, Massachusetts summer arts community, all expenses paid.  Before and after that, I was back to “nowhere to go.”

 We got in Steve’s MG, and by the time we got to Ohio—and drank coffee while being stared at by truckers—we realized that outside of Buffalo, and despite the ongoing crisis, it was spring. 

 The story of that Galesburg visit—including my participation in The Students Are Revolting and the takeover of an administrative office, as well as the political books of the time—is told in a prior post indexed to this series, published on the 50th anniversary of these events.  Next in this sequence, I’ll pick up the story at Cummington and Cambridge, Massachusetts in the summer of 1970.