Wednesday, October 24, 2018

The Tantrum Defined (in Context)

Richard Powers:

"History is filled with moments when doomed regimes redouble their own insanity by speeding up self-destruction rather than capitulating to accountability. We are in one such moment, perhaps the most catastrophic one ever.

No one should be fooled: the motive behind all of this “deregulation” is not primarily economic. Any reasonable accounting reveals that the sum of these measures carries external costs far greater than the hoped-for benefits. (Did you know that the number-one killer in the world is pollution? And that doesn’t even include premature deaths from climate change.)

The push to remove all environmental safety strikes me as mostly psychological. It’s driven by a will to total dominance, underwritten by the hierarchy of values that George Lakoff calls “stern paternalism,” putting men above women, whites above minorities, Americans above all other countries, and humans above all other living things. Trumpism calls it a return to greatness (a.k.a., “Grab ’em by the…”). It might better be called a tantrum in the face of a crumbling control fantasy."
*                                                       *                                                *

"Of course, the real question about optimism and hopefulness is: Hopeful for what? I have zero hope that our current culture of consumer individualism will survive. How could it? Its basic principles are at war with real real life, and fantasy can’t defeat inexorable biological truths. There is no place for a system predicated on endless growth in a world of finite resources being infinitely recycled. Anyone who can’t conceive of a way for humans to exist other than capitalism will find herself pinned under overwhelming despair.

But hopeful for life? It’s a pretty good long-term bet. The planet has several times come back from the brink of nothing, even from perturbations in the planetary systems as violent as the one we have set in motion. That kind of hope, though, requires thinking on the scale and time frame of forests, not people."

Richard Powers
Interview with the Los Angeles Times Book Review on his novel Overstory. Emphasis added.

I don't necessarily agree that deregulation isn't primarily economic--that is, based on greed-- as it benefits a small number of wealthy corporations and rich Republicans, and therefore their corrupt political minions.  But I do agree that the "crumbling control fantasy" is a major component of what's going on now, especially its emotional power.  Anyone can have a control fantasy, even those oppressed by the wealthy who identify with those who were used to controlling things; identifying with them on the basis of race, gender and ideology.  Powers articulates this well.

No comments: