I've been reading about the years 1936 to 1941 in the U.S., including the politics of those elections. There really is disgustingly little difference between the politics of now and then. 1936 was a total preview of 2012, as FDR ran for a second term, was called a Communist by Republican opponents, and worse by right wing splinter groups (their Birthers insisted FDR was really Jewish.) Rs tried to scare people about the horrors of the fully implemented Social Security system (everyone in the country will be taxed for s.s.! And everybody will get a number! And be forced to wear it on a chain around their necks for the rest of their lives!) Nothing at all like being
terrified that Obamacare might actually do some good.
Meanwhile the Rs including the candidate were certain right up to election day that they would win, because the people would reject FDR. When the votes were counted, only Vermont and Maine rejected FDR.
And then a chastened, much smarter Republican party in 1940, pretty much did the same damn thing. In complete denial about Hitler and U.S. vulnerability. Congressional Rs voted down FDR's defense requests and then castigated him in the campaign for not building up U.S. defenses. The only difference is that a not insane Wendell Wilkie got nominated by a combination of fluke and actual popularity (but not with congressional Rs) and when they lost again, they still didn't change.
It seems that the Republican party was partly sane in the 50s, some of the 60s and 70s--although they did elect a mad president. But sanity, that's just not them. Venality and hypocrisy are merely symptoms.
And perhaps it's too much to ask let alone expect that politics itself be sane. It sure isn't right now. There are two themes currently coexisting in the gratefully little punditry I see: the Republican party is falling apart and
dooming itself, and the Republican party is likely to regain a
Senate majority and probably won't lose the House in the next election. Huh?
As contradictory as this seems, it suggests a current phenomenon that is actually dooming our political system to inflated ineffectual twittering. In 2008, those many who voted in the U.S. elected a Democratic president and Congress, to do what they said they'd do. In 2010, those few who voted in the states elected reactionary Republican fanatics, throwing the U.S. House to the dogs, and doing worse in the states.
With the reelection of the Democratic president in 2012 that all was supposed to change, or change back. Now there's every possibility that the non-presidential 2014 elections will make things worse. One step forward, two steps back.
Another reading of history suggest maybe it will take
one more presidential election. Okay, I'll check back in early 2017.