Cloud computing, sold to a tech-drunk citizenry as the latest heavenly benefit of the corporate gods of cyberspace, is perhaps the biggest environmental blind spot left. Because, as this NPR report points out, these clouds aren't puffy white spirits smiling from the sky. They're acres of machines on earth, needing and ravenously eating power in rapidly increasing quantities.
Right now, Greenpeace estimates that if the cloud were a country it would rank sixth in the world in power consumption, just before the actual country of Germany. The New York Times figures it would take 30 nuclear power plants to supply it. It also needs constant air conditioning and enormous amounts of water to keep all those fevered machines cool.
And the cloud is getting bigger all the time. For now, most of the electricity is generated by clean energy methods, mostly wind and water power. But how long can that last? It may even be that so much clean energy is being soaked up by servers that a lot less is being used for the normal grid than otherwise might be the case.
Apart from the ramifications for the environment and the climate crisis, there's the issue of vulnerability. Consumers are only too eager to cede control to corporations that store an increasing proportion of what we've learned to call information. So photos, music and reading material as well as important documents are increasingly being stored nowhere but in some cloud somewhere. And it takes electricity all along the way from there to you in order for it to, well, exist.
So what happens when the cloud blows up or the power goes off long enough to erase everything in the cloud? Or you lose your electricity and therefore your access for part or all of the time? And you look around to find no photo albums, no recorded music, not even CDs or DVDs, let alone magazines or books. Just your multiple "platforms" now connecting you to nothing.
But even without an electric Armageddon, none of this stuff (which is no longer "stuff" but digits) is actually yours anymore. It belongs to the company that holds the cloud. You're only renting access to it, if you accept the terms and conditions and how the hell could you not?
Though several people in my life have tried to buy me a Kindle or similar device, I've resisted. At first it was until the devices were improved and more versatile. And maybe until prices of books etc. came down (which is never going to happen now that so many people are hooked on the devices.)
Then this weekend I saw at TPM that subscribers (i.e. paid subscribers) were going to be discussing "the transformation from reading paper books to digital books," and proprietor Josh Marshall admitted that he switched to digital three years ago, and is now unable to read paper books anymore.
That scared me straight. No digital drugs for me. When I buy a book, or borrow one from a library, it's mine. I can hold it, carry it wherever, but most of all, it's mine. It doesn't sit in some cloud where Amazon is always watching, and sending me emails asking me how I like it. Or more to the point, where Amazon can always take it away from me. Amazon, the cloud, or the grid.
A World of Falling Skies
-
Since I started posting reviews of books on the climate crisis, there have
been significant additions--so many I won't even attempt to get to all of
them. ...
20 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment