Last week Colorado was hit with a sudden and surprisingly ferocious series of wildfires.
CNN reported:
Over several hellish days, the Black Forest Fire singed more than 15,000 acres north of Colorado Springs. What's left behind, in some areas, "looks like a nuclear bomb went off," according to El Paso County Sheriff Terry Maketa.
In the first few days after the first broke out, for still unexplained reasons, crews had zero containment on the Black Forest Fire as it ravaged woods and neighborhoods. County spokesman Dave Rose told CNN it appeared to be the most destructive in the history of Colorado -- a state that's all too familiar with devastating wildfires.
By Saturday and Sunday, the Black Forest Fire was mostly contained, but several other large wildfires broke out elsewhere in Colorado.
The Colorado fire and its exceptional nature are no longer exceptional in huge swaths of the United States. The droughts and dryness and resulting fires are burning up state funds but also the common fund called federal, which thanks to the wolves in Congress, has less money and fewer resources. This
CBS News report:
Fire season has exploded across the country. So far this year, more than 19,000
wildfires have scorched the equivalent of 700 square miles, forcing thousands
out of their homes.
"We've had numerous fires already," said firefighter Miguel Martinez. "I
foresee a very busy season for us."
Martinez fights fires in California, where the number of wildfires is up 45
percent this year. The reason: unusually dry weather. Nearly half the country is
already experiencing moderate to exceptional drought conditions.
"We've seen a significant change for the worse, in terms of how hot fires
burn and how quickly they explode," said Tom Harbour, fire chief for the U.S.
Forest Service. But federal firefighters are facing another challenge: a loss $50 million
mandated by the budget sequester. That forced the Forest Service to cut 500
firefighters and 50 engines just when they're needed most."
Climate crisis effects like fires that require federal responses mean that climate changes in one locality or state eventually affect everyone in the country, if only through federal taxes. Then of course there is the economic activity that is lessened, the crops burned up by droughts, etc. Global heating is not just an atmospheric phenomenon with different local effects. It is a fact: those local disruptions and catastrophes ripple very far, and the ripples don't necessarily fade with distance.
For another example, a
new study found that the impact of climate crisis on the UK is not limited to rising sea levels and hotter summers: an even greater impact may be the availability of food imports.
"What's interesting is that threats from climate change overseas appear an
order of magnitude higher than domestic threats," PWC's Richard Gledhill told
BBC News.
"This doesn't just refer to the most vulnerable countries like the small
island states... climate events in developed countries could damage the UK
economy by impacting on food and other resources. We could also suffer damage to
assets from events like the floods in central Europe or Superstorm Sandy; this
all feeds back into the UK economy."
Many crucial ways of addressing the climate crisis are local, regional, national. But at least at this level of human civilization, the truth is we're all in this together, and solutions on dealing both with causes and effects of the climate crisis are necessarily global.
No comments:
Post a Comment